Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi e-tron GT vs Dacia Spring comparison
Compare performance (843 HP vs 102 HP), boot space and price (93,300 £ vs 14,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi e-tron GT or Dacia Spring?
Audi e-tron GT vs Dacia Spring: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
e-tron GT
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Dacia Spring is considerably cheaper – starting at 14,500 £ , while the Audi e-tron GT costs 93,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 78,857 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Dacia Spring is substantially more efficient: consuming 12.4 kWh/100km compared to 17.9 kWh/100km for the Audi e-tron GT. That’s a difference of about 5.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi e-tron GT offers clearly more range – reaching up to 617 km, about 392 km more than the Dacia Spring.
Spring
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi e-tron GT offers considerably more power – delivering 843 HP compared to 102 HP. That’s roughly 741 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi e-tron GT is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 2.9 s, while the Dacia Spring takes 9.6 s. That’s about 6.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi e-tron GT delivers clearly more torque with 1,027 Nm compared to 137 Nm. That’s about 890 Nm more.
e-tron GT
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 4 people.
In terms of curb weight, Dacia Spring is significantly lighter – 1,070 kg compared to 2,355 kg. The difference is around 1,285 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi e-tron GT offers clearly more boot space – 405 L compared to 308 L. That’s a difference of about 97 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi e-tron GT carries clearly more – 485 kg compared to 274 kg. That’s a difference of about 211 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Dacia Spring is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £14,500
Dacia Spring
Audi e-tron GT
Dacia Spring
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi e-tron GT
The Audi e-tron GT is a striking electric grand tourer that blends dramatic, low-slung styling with the hushed refinement of a luxury saloon. Behind the beautiful skin you'll find a driver-focused cabin and brisk, silent performance that makes daily commutes feel like auditioning for a weekend road trip — and yes, it manages to be both serious and a little bit smug about it.
details
Dacia Spring
The Dacia Spring is an unpretentious city electric that strips EV ownership down to the essentials, offering clean, fuss-free transport for daily urban life. It won't impress luxury-seekers, but its cheerful practicality and rock-bottom running costs make it a clever, no-nonsense choice for anyone who wants electric mobility without the drama.
details
Audi e-tron GT
Dacia Spring
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
93,300 - 137,600 £
|
Price
14,500 - 16,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.9 - 19 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
12.4 - 12.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
582 - 617 km
|
Electric Range
221 - 225 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Coupe
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,355 - 2,395 kg
|
Curb weight
1,070 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 405 L
|
Trunk capacity
308 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,964 mm
|
Width
1,583 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
455 - 485 kg
|
Payload
274 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
503 - 843 HP
|
Power HP
70 - 102 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.9 - 4.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.6 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
625 - 1,027 Nm
|
Torque
137 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
370 - 620 kW
|
Power kW
52 - 75 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Dacia
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.