Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi e-tron GT vs Volvo EX40 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (843 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (93300 £ vs 42800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi e-tron GT or Volvo EX40?
e-tron GT
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Volvo EX40 has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 42800 £ , while the Audi e-tron GT costs 93300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 50494 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Volvo EX40: with 16.60 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the Audi e-tron GT with 17.90 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.30 kWh.
As for electric range, the Audi e-tron GT performs slight better – achieving up to 617 km, about 41 km more than the Volvo EX40.
EX40
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi e-tron GT has a clearly edge – offering 843 HP compared to 442 HP. That’s roughly 401 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi e-tron GT is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 2.90 s, while the Volvo EX40 takes 4.60 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Audi e-tron GT performs noticeable better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Volvo EX40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 70 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Audi e-tron GT pulls noticeable stronger with 1027 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 357 Nm difference.
e-tron GT
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Volvo EX40 offers a bit more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.
In curb weight, Volvo EX40 is somewhat lighter – 2040 kg compared to 2355 kg. The difference is around 315 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Volvo EX40 offers slight more room – 410 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 5 L.
When it comes to payload, Audi e-tron GT minimal takes the win – 485 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi e-tron GT is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Audi e-tron GT
Volvo EX40
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £93,300
Audi e-tron GT
Audi e-tron GT
The Audi e-tron GT is a striking electric grand tourer that blends dramatic, low-slung styling with the hushed refinement of a luxury saloon. Behind the beautiful skin you'll find a driver-focused cabin and brisk, silent performance that makes daily commutes feel like auditioning for a weekend road trip — and yes, it manages to be both serious and a little bit smug about it.
details
Volvo EX40
5 (1 Reviews)
The Volvo EX40 wraps Scandinavian calm and clever practicality into a compact electric package that feels both premium and refreshingly uncomplicated. It's the grown-up answer to flashier rivals — a safe, comfy, and city-friendly EV with thoughtful tech that makes everyday driving quietly satisfying.
details
Audi e-tron GT
Volvo EX40
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
93300 - 137600 £
|
Price
42800 - 58200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.9 - 19 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
582 - 617 km
|
Electric Range
480 - 576 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
97 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Coupe
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2355 - 2395 kg
|
Curb weight
2040 - 2170 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 405 L
|
Trunk capacity
410 L
|
|
Length
4997 - 5004 mm
|
Length
4440 mm
|
|
Width
1964 mm
|
Width
1863 mm
|
|
Height
1379 - 1394 mm
|
Height
1647 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1400 L
|
|
Payload
455 - 485 kg
|
Payload
430 - 480 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
503 - 843 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.9 - 4.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
245 - 250 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
625 - 1027 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
370 - 620 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Is the Audi e-tron GT offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.