What drivetrain options does the Audi Q2 have?

The Audi Q2 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Audi Q2?

Depending on the version, the Audi Q2 delivers up to 300 HP.

How much fuel does the Audi Q2 use?

On average, the Audi Q2 consumes 4.80 L.

What are the Audi Q2’s length, width and height?

Overall, the Audi Q2 is 4208 mm long, 1794 mm wide and 1508 mm high.

Is the Kia Stonic offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia Stonic is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Kia Stonic's engine?

Up to 115 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Kia Stonic use?

On average, the Kia Stonic consumes 5.60 L.

How many liters of cargo space does the Kia Stonic offer?

Depending on configuration, up to 352 L fit inside.

What are the Kia Stonic’s length, width and height?

Overall, the Kia Stonic is 4165 mm long, 1760 mm wide and 1520 mm high.

Audi Q2 vs Kia Stonic - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q2 @ Audi AG

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Kia Stonic has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20100 £, while the Audi Q2 costs 24900 £. That’s a price difference of around 4723 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Audi Q2 manages with 4.80 L and is therefore slightly more efficient than the Kia Stonic with 5.60 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.

Stonic @ Kia Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q2 has a clearly edge – offering 300 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 185 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q2 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Kia Stonic takes 10.70 s. That’s about 5.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Audi Q2 performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Kia Stonic tops out at 182 km/h. The difference is around 68 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q2 pulls clearly stronger with 400 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm difference.

Q2 @ Audi AG

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Kia Stonic is slightly lighter – 1205 kg compared to 1330 kg. The difference is around 125 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Audi Q2 offers a bit more room – 405 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 53 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Kia Stonic performs minimal better – up to 1155 L, which is about 105 L more than the Audi Q2.

When it comes to payload, Audi Q2 a bit takes the win – 510 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 65 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Audi Q2 shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Audi Q2

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews Kia Stonic

Top Car Comparisons

@ Hyundai Motor Company

In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Hyundai Bayon and Kia Stonic each offer unique appeal with their distinctive designs and performance characteristics. While the Bayon impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the Stonic stands out for its sporty handling and …

In the battle of compact crossovers, the Kia Niro and Kia Stonic each bring their own unique strengths to the table. The Niro impresses with its hybrid efficiency and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for eco-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Stonic stands out with its sporty design and …

Costs and Consumption
Price 24900 - 43600 £	Price 20100 - 26600 £
Consumption L/100km 4.8 - 8.1 L	Consumption L/100km 5.6 - 5.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 127 - 183 g/km	co2 127 - 133 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 50 - 55 L	Fuel tank capacity 45 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1330 - 1610 kg	Curb weight 1205 - 1270 kg
Trunk capacity 355 - 405 L	Trunk capacity 352 L
Length 4208 - 4216 mm	Length 4165 mm
Width 1794 - 1802 mm	Width 1760 mm
Height 1495 - 1508 mm	Height 1520 mm
Max trunk capacity 1000 - 1050 L	Max trunk capacity 1155 L
Payload 450 - 510 kg	Payload 440 - 445 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol, Diesel	Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 116 - 300 HP	Power HP 100 - 115 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 4.9 - 10.5 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.7 - 12.1 s
Max Speed 197 - 250 km/h	Max Speed 179 - 182 km/h
Torque 200 - 400 Nm	Torque 172 - 200 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders 3
Power kW 85 - 221 kW	Power kW 74 - 85 kW
Engine capacity 999 - 1984 cm3	Engine capacity 998 cm3