VS

Audi Q3 vs Omoda 5 comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 224 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 24,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Omoda 5?

Audi Q3 vs Omoda 5: Key differences

Audi Q3

4.2 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • substantially more electric range
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Omoda 5 is substantially cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Audi Q3 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,457 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Omoda 5 with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 3.6 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Omoda 5 offers substantially more range – reaching up to 430 km, about 311 km more than the Audi Q3.

5

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 offers moderately more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 224 HP. That’s roughly 48 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Omoda 5 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q3 delivers slightly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 340 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.

Q3

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Omoda 5 is marginally lighter – 1,621 kg compared to 1,635 kg. The difference is around 14 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q3 offers noticeably more boot space – 488 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 138 L.

When it comes to payload, the Omoda 5 carries marginally more – 536 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q3 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,200
Q3

Audi Q3

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 118 - 119 km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Omoda 5
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Omoda 5 and BYD Atto 2 are eye-catching compact crossovers that compete on modern styling, tech-packed cabins and strong value for money. This quick comparison will show how they differ in space, equipment, driving character and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Audi Q3
Omoda 5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q3

The Audi Q3 is a compact premium crossover that blends sharp styling with a well-crafted interior, making it an appealing choice for urban drivers who want a touch of luxury. It delivers a composed ride, intuitive tech features and a practical cabin, so it works well as a comfortable daily driver with an upscale feel.

details
A188605_overfull
A188610_overfull
A188613_overfull
A1814467_overfull
A188626_overfull

Reviews Audi Q3

4.2 (3 Reviews)
rate
dd
2 Nov 2025, 22:05:04

Very comfortable. Precise steering. E35 petrol engine, 150 hp — sufficient. Manual gearbox very good and well-geared. Looks very handsome. Very large boot. Premium interior.

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a stylish compact crossover that catches the eye with a bold, contemporary look and a tech-forward cabin. It offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly spacious interior, making it a practical yet distinctive choice for buyers who want modern features and solid value.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pablo
8 May 2026, 07:59:00

Fantastic. It would be great to have a bit more battery capacity and a higher DC charging speed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

Frequently compared as well

Omoda 5
Renault Symbioz
VS
This comparison pits the Omoda 5 against the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which car fits your needs. We'll cover design, practicality, driving experience, technology and running costs so you can tell whether the pragmatic, value-oriented Omoda 5 or the more futuristic Renault Symbioz aligns …
Omoda 5
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Omoda 5 brings bold, modern styling and a tech-forward package, while the Toyota C‑HR emphasizes distinctive design, proven reliability and a refined hybrid powertrain. This comparison covers practicality, driving character, equipment and running costs to help you decide which compact crossover …
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
Choosing between the Omoda 5 and the MG HS comes down to whether you want a compact crossover that prioritises bold styling and tech, or a more traditionally sized SUV that leans on space and refinement. Below is a clear, experience-based comparison to help match each model to your driving …
Hyundai Tucson
Omoda 5
VS
The Hyundai Tucson and the Omoda 5 are two compact SUVs that appeal to buyers seeking practicality with distinct personalities — Tucson for proven dependability, Omoda 5 for sharp styling and tech-focused features. This comparison will pinpoint how they differ in space, equipment, driving feel and …
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Audi Q3 and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you value Audi’s upmarket feel and refinement or the T‑Roc’s sharper pricing and practical versatility. This comparison focuses on real-world driving, interior quality, technology and running costs to help you decide which compact …
BYD Seal U
Omoda 5
VS
The BYD Seal U and Omoda 5 sit at different points of the market: the Seal U is a tech‑forward electric with strong range and efficiency, while the Omoda 5 is a stylish, value‑focused compact crossover. This comparison highlights real‑world driving, interior comfort, features and ownership costs so …
Omoda 5
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The Omoda 5 and the MG 5 EV pit two different takes on compact family motoring against each other: the Omoda 5 delivers crossover styling, tech and a choice of powertrains, while the MG 5 EV is a practical, battery-electric estate focused on value and efficiency. If you favour bold design and a …
Dacia Duster
Omoda 5
VS
The Dacia Duster and Omoda 5 are compact SUVs that take different approaches: the Duster prioritizes rugged practicality, simplicity and low running costs, while the Omoda 5 leans on bold styling, tech-rich cabins and a more refined on-road feel. This quick comparison will help you decide whether …
Audi Q3
Omoda 5

Costs and Consumption
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
Price
24,800 - 31,600 £
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
Electric Range
430 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
39 - 195 g/km
co2
0 - 120 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
Curb weight
1,621 - 1,710 kg
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Trunk capacity
300 - 350 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,859 mm
Width
1,824 - 1,830 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 535 kg
Payload
431 - 536 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
204 - 224 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
295 - 340 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
150 - 165 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
Brand
Audi
Brand
Omoda
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q3 have?

The Audi Q3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.