VS

Audi Q3 vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Renault Clio?

Audi Q3 vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space

Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • visibly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q3

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Clio is substantially cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Audi Q3 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,171 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Renault Clio with 4.1 L/100km. The difference is about 2.4 L/100km.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 offers significantly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 114 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q3 delivers significantly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 210 Nm more.

Q3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is visibly lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,635 kg. The difference is around 433 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q3 offers noticeably more boot space – 488 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 161 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q3 carries moderately more – 535 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 72 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,200
Q3

Audi Q3

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 118 - 119 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
Audi Q3
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q3

The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.

details
A188605_overfull
A188610_overfull
A188613_overfull
A1814467_overfull
A188626_overfull

Reviews Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
dd
2 Nov 2025, 22:05:04

Very comfortable. Precise steering. E35 petrol engine, 150 hp — sufficient. Manual gearbox very good and well-geared. Looks very handsome. Very large boot. Premium interior.

Renault Clio

The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai i10
Renault Clio
VS
The Hyundai i10 is a pocket-sized urban pro — cheeky on fuel, effortless to park and surprisingly roomy for its class, ideal if your daily grind is dodging bollards and squeezing into parallel spaces. The Renault Clio, by contrast, plays the grown-up card with sharper styling, a nicer interior and …
Renault Clio
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Renault Clio and Toyota Yaris both stand out in the compact car segment, each offering distinct advantages for urban driving. The Clio impresses with its stylish design and exceptional fuel efficiency, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and running costs. Meanwhile, the Yaris shines …
Audi Q3
Audi Q4 e-tron
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact luxury SUVs, the Audi Q3 and Audi Q4 e-tron present distinct offerings tailored to different preferences. The Q3 impresses with its spirited performance and traditional gasoline engine, while the Q4 e-tron showcases Audi's commitment to electrification with a …
Renault Clio
SEAT Ibiza
VS
In the showdown between the Renault Clio and the SEAT Ibiza, both hatchbacks bring impressive credentials to the table, vying for leadership in the compact car segment. The Renault Clio continues to charm with its chic design and cutting-edge technology, providing a driving experience that balances …
Renault Clio
VW Polo
VS
In the competitive supermini segment, the Renault Clio and VW Polo stand out for their blend of style, performance, and practicality. The Clio boasts a more dynamic design and an engaging driving experience, while the Polo is celebrated for its refined build quality and advanced technology …
Audi Q3
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Audi Q3 dresses up compact-SUV practicality in premium polish — plush interior, refined ride and tech that whispers “grown-up” refinement. The CUPRA Terramar, by contrast, prowls with sharper handling, punchier engines and a sporty attitude that’ll make you smile even if the mpg takes a hit, so …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Renault Clio
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the ongoing battle of compact hatchbacks, the Renault Clio and Skoda Fabia have both staked their claim for supremacy. The Clio boasts a stylish design and a reputation for comfort, often appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and innovative tech in their daily drive. Meanwhile, the Fabia …
Audi Q3
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
39 - 195 g/km
co2
92 - 115 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
-
Length
4,116 mm
Width
1,859 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
-
Height
1,451 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,094 - 1,176 L
Payload
505 - 535 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
Brand
Audi
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q3 have?

The Audi Q3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.