VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs CUPRA Terramar comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (39,600 £ vs 41,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or CUPRA Terramar?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs CUPRA Terramar: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

CUPRA Terramar

5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Q4 e-tron

Comparative Analysis: Audi Q4 e-tron vs CUPRA Terramar

As the automotive market continues to evolve, electric and hybrid vehicles are becoming the new norm. Two notable contenders in the SUV segment are the Audi Q4 e-tron and the CUPRA Terramar. Both vehicles are designed to meet the consumers' diverse demands for performance, efficiency, and technology. In this article, we’ll plunge into a side-by-side comparison of these two innovative models, examining their technical aspects and innovative features.

Terramar

Powertrain and Performance

The Audi Q4 e-tron is available in various configurations, with power outputs ranging from 170 HP to an impressive 340 HP. It utilizes a purely electric powertrain with options for rear-wheel and all-wheel drive, allowing for dynamic handling and acceleration. In terms of performance, the Q4 e-tron boasts an acceleration of 0-100 km/h in as quick as 5.4 seconds, showcasing its sporty edge.

On the other hand, the CUPRA Terramar offers a range of powertrain options, including plug-in hybrid, petrol MHEV, and petrol versions, generating up to 272 HP. It accelerates from 0-100 km/h in as little as 5.3 seconds when equipped with the right configuration, proving that it is not to be underestimated in terms of speed and agility.

Q4 e-tron

Efficiency and Range

Efficiency is key for modern SUVs, and the Q4 e-tron shines with an electrical consumption range between 15.9 to 17.4 kWh/100 km. With an electric range of up to 554 km, it poses an excellent option for those looking to reduce their carbon footprint without compromising on travel distance.

The CUPRA Terramar, with its petrol engines, offers fuel consumption figures ranging from 0.4 to 8.5 L/100 km depending on the engine type. Its plug-in hybrid variant provides an electric range of up to 120 km, which can be particularly advantageous for short commutes or urban driving, where electric-only operation can minimize fuel consumption.

Terramar

Interior Comfort and Technology

Both vehicles provide a well-appointed interior with room for five passengers. The Audi Q4 e-tron stands out with its trunk capacity of up to 535 liters, providing ample space for cargo. The cockpit brims with modern technology, featuring a digital dashboard and advanced infotainment systems that integrate seamlessly with smartphones.

Meanwhile, the CUPRA Terramar emphasizes a sportier look, reflecting the brand’s performance-oriented ethos. The cabin incorporates contemporary design elements while still ensuring comfort and usability. Its trunk space offers up to 540 liters, slightly outperforming the Q4 in terms of utility.

Q4 e-tron

Safety and Driver Assistance Features

Safety is paramount in any modern vehicle, and both the Q4 e-tron and Terramar come equipped with a suite of advanced driver assistance systems. Audi’s reputation for safety is evident in the Q4 e-tron with features such as adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and a robust suite of airbags.

CUPRA is also making large strides in this department, incorporating features like adaptive cruise control, a 360-degree camera system, and advanced collision warning systems that enhance driver confidence on the road.

Terramar

Conclusion: Choosing Between Innovation and Performance

The decision between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the CUPRA Terramar ultimately hinges on consumer priorities. If a cutting-edge electric SUV with a longer range is the goal, the Q4 e-tron proves to be exemplary. Conversely, for those focused on hybrid versatility and spirited driving experiences, the Terramar is an attractive candidate.

In the rapidly evolving automotive landscape, both models represent their brands’ commitment to innovation, sustainability, and driving pleasure. As the future progresses, these vehicles will likely continue to influence the trajectory of SUV designs on the roads.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Audi Q4 e-tron is only slightly cheaper – starting at 39,600 £ , while the CUPRA Terramar costs 41,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,860 £.

As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers clearly more range – reaching up to 554 km, about 436 km more than the CUPRA Terramar.

Terramar

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers moderately more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the CUPRA Terramar takes 5.9 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers significantly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 279 Nm more.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, CUPRA Terramar is markedly lighter – 1,638 kg compared to 2,035 kg. The difference is around 397 kg.

Looking at boot space, the CUPRA Terramar offers very slightly more boot space – 540 L compared to 535 L. That’s a difference of about 5 L.

When it comes to payload, the CUPRA Terramar carries only slightly more – 542 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 27 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q4 e-tron holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £39,600
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.9 - 17.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 406 - 554 km
Audi Q4 e-tron
CUPRA Terramar

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron brings Audi polish into the electric crossover scene, pairing a sleek exterior with a refined, airy interior that makes everyday driving feel distinctly premium. It’s an easy-to-live-with EV that balances comfort and real-world usability with intuitive tech, making it a smart choice for buyers who want electric mobility without giving up Audi character — and yes, it still looks good in the driveway.

details

CUPRA Terramar

The CUPRA Terramar is a sharply styled, sporty SUV that brings athletic handling and bold design to buyers who want performance with everyday usability. Inside, premium finishes meet driver-focused flair and family-friendly practicality, making it a tempting pick for anyone who wants thrills without turning their daily routine into a chore.

details
Audi Q4 e-tron
CUPRA Terramar

Costs and Consumption

Price
39,600 - 58,800 £
Price
41,400 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 8.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
406 - 554 km
Electric Range
118 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
36 - 191 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
1,638 - 1,904 kg
Trunk capacity
520 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
450 - 540 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
1,869 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
512 - 542 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General

Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B, G
Brand
Audi
Brand
CUPRA
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.