VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Ford Puma – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Audi Q4 e-tron or Ford Puma?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Puma has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 39600 £. That’s a price difference of around 14786 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s clearly perceptible more efficient than the Audi Q4 e-tron with 15.90 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.80 kWh.

As for range, the Audi Q4 e-tron performs noticeable better – achieving up to 554 km, about 178 km more than the Ford Puma.

Engine and Performance: Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron has a decisively edge – offering 340 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 172 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 2 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs to a small extent better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Audi Q4 e-tron tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q4 e-tron pulls decisively stronger with 679 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 389 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use: Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1316 kg compared to 2035 kg. The difference is around 719 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers barely noticeable more room – 535 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 12 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Audi Q4 e-tron performs to a small extent better – up to 1490 L, which is about 207 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, Audi Q4 e-tron barely noticeable takes the win – 515 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 46 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Audi Q4 e-tron proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Audi Q4 e-tron is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £39,600
A213272_overfull

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.9 - 17.4 kWh
  • Electric Range : 406 - 554 km
details

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron seamlessly combines sustainable driving with premium comfort, embodying the brand's commitment to electric mobility. Its sleek design and spacious interior create an inviting atmosphere, perfect for those who appreciate both style and practicality. With a focus on innovative technology, the Q4 e-tron offers a dynamic driving experience that appeals to modern drivers seeking eco-friendly alternatives.

details
A213272_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A213273_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A213248_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A213261_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A213263_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A213264_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday practicality, the ID.3 for smooth, emissions-free cruising and lower running costs — your wallet and the planet will thank you differently.
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
In the compact EV SUV showdown, the Audi Q4 e‑tron leans into classy understatement with a roomier, more refined interior and a smoother, long-distance friendly ride. The BMW iX1, meanwhile, trades some comfort for sportier handling and a livelier, driver-focused feel—pick the Q4 for comfort and polish, the iX1 if you want more fun behind the wheel.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Ford Puma
Q4 e-tron
Puma

Costs and Consumption
Price
39600 - 58800 £
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.4 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Electric Range
406 - 554 km
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2035 - 2235 kg
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Trunk capacity
520 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Length
4588 mm
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Width
1865 mm
Width
1805 mm
Height
1614 - 1632 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Max trunk capacity
1460 - 1490 L
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2023 - 2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
Brand
Audi
Brand
Ford

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
MG MG4
VS
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty handling and stylish design, appealing to those who crave a dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the MG4, with its affordable pricing and generous equipment list, offers a compelling alternative, particularly for those prioritizing value for money. Both models bring unique strengths, making the choice largely dependent on whether the buyer seeks spirited performance or practical features.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
In the growing lineup of Audi's electric vehicles, the Audi Q4 e-tron and Audi Q6 e-tron stand out as compelling options for those seeking a blend of performance and luxury. While the Q4 e-tron offers a compact SUV experience with impressive range and tech features, the Q6 e-tron elevates the game with its more robust powertrain options and futuristic design. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on buyers' priorities, whether they favor the agility of the Q4 or the advanced capabilities of the Q6.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Corsa
VS
In the highly competitive compact car segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its robust styling and dynamic driving performance, offering a sporty edge perfect for city and country roads alike. In contrast, the Vauxhall Corsa impresses with its practical design and tech-forward interior, appealing to those who prioritize efficiency and comfort in a more streamlined package. Ultimately, the choice between the Puma and Corsa hinges on whether your preference leans towards spirited driving or urban practicality.
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX3
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX3 stand out with their distinct design philosophies and advanced technologies. The Q4 e-tron impresses with its spacious interior and cutting-edge infotainment system, while the iX3 offers a more traditional BMW driving experience with its dynamic handling and electric performance. Both vehicles cater to eco-conscious consumers, but potential buyers will need to weigh factors like range, charging capabilities, and personal style preferences before making a decision.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Frontera
VS
In the latest showdown between the Ford Puma and Opel Frontera, performance enthusiasts will find the Puma's sleek design and nimble handling a stark contrast to the Frontera's rugged off-road capabilities. While the Puma excels in urban agility and fuel efficiency, the Frontera stands out for its durability and versatility in challenging terrains. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on personal lifestyle needs, with the Puma appealing more to city drivers and the Frontera capturing the spirit of adventure seekers.
Ford Focus
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma stands out with its stylish design and versatility, offering a sportier feel while maintaining practicality for everyday use.
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma and the Renault 5 both offer unique appeals in the compact car segment. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a blend of style and performance. In contrast, the Renault 5 charms with its iconic retro design and efficient urban mobility, making it a beloved choice for city drivers who appreciate a touch of nostalgia with modern functionality.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
In the rapidly evolving electric vehicle landscape, the Audi Q4 e-tron stands out with its sleek design and impressive performance, offering a refined driving experience infused with premium features. Conversely, the Volvo EX40 champions safety and practicality, boasting a minimalist interior paired with advanced technological integrations. Both models cater to environmentally conscious consumers, yet they each bring a distinct personality to the growing EV market, making the choice between them a matter of personal preference and lifestyle needs.
What drive types are available for the Audi Q4 e-tron?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.