Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi Q4 e-tron vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (340 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or Ford Puma?
Audi Q4 e-tron vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Q4 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 40,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,800 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is somewhat more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 14.8 kWh/100km for the Audi Q4 e-tron. That’s a difference of about 1.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers clearly more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 175 km more than the Ford Puma.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers considerably more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 172 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers significantly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 389 Nm more.
Q4 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,035 kg. The difference is around 719 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers very slightly more boot space – 535 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 12 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q4 e-tron carries marginally more – 515 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 46 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q4 e-tron is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £40,700
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q4 e-tron
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q4 e-tron
The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Audi Q4 e-tron
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,865 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
505 - 515 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.