VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Kia Stonic comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 115 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 20,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or Kia Stonic?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Kia Stonic: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

Kia Stonic

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Kia Stonic is substantially cheaper – starting at 20,400 £ , while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 40,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,323 £.

Stonic

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers considerably more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 225 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Kia Stonic takes 10.7 s. That’s about 5.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers significantly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 479 Nm more.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Kia Stonic is clearly lighter – 1,205 kg compared to 2,035 kg. The difference is around 830 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers visibly more boot space – 535 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 183 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q4 e-tron carries a bit more – 515 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q4 e-tron stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,700
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 440 - 592 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX1 are compact electric SUVs that aim to balance everyday practicality with distinct brand characters — the Q4 e-tron leans toward refined comfort and a premium cabin, while the iX1 emphasizes sporty handling and tech-forward features. This comparison will walk you …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Kia Stonic

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details
A213272_overfull
A213273_overfull
A213248_overfull
A213261_overfull
A213263_overfull
A213264_overfull

Reviews Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Alain
10 Jun 2026, 00:16:47

A more attractive vehicle inside and out, with German reliability.

Kia Stonic

The Kia Stonic is a compact crossover that pairs nimble city manners with a surprisingly spacious and comfortable cabin. It’s a practical, well-equipped choice for buyers who value sensible features, approachable styling and easy everyday usability.

details
Kia_Stonic_MY22_04
Kia_Stonic_MY22_16
Kia_Stonic_MY22_15
Kia_Stonic_MY22_08
Kia_Stonic_MJ22_05

Reviews Kia Stonic

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
Jan
18 Mar 2026, 07:19:10

Very good car, uses little fuel, nothing's gone wrong in 4 years, no breakdowns.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ennio
4 Feb 2026, 13:19:36

I'm very satisfied — I have a Stonic Black Edition hybrid, and I haven't had any problems after two years.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Kia Stonic
Kia XCeed
VS
In the city crossover showdown, the Kia Stonic is the cheeky, budget-friendly pocket SUV while the Kia XCeed steps up as the sleeker, more grown-up option with sharper handling and extra space. Pick the Stonic for low running costs and easy parking; go for the XCeed if you want a more planted …
Hyundai Bayon
Kia Stonic
VS
Small crossover, big decisions: the Hyundai Bayon and Kia Stonic duke it out in the compact SUV ring, each promising city-smarts, style and sensible running costs. One brings bold tech and fresh looks, the other leans on practicality and value — so let’s see which small SUV deserves your keys (and …
Kia Picanto
Kia Stonic
VS
The Kia Picanto and Kia Stonic are closely related but aimed at different needs: the Picanto is a pint-sized city hatch built for nimble urban driving and low running costs, while the Stonic is a small crossover that adds higher seating, extra boot space and a more rugged presence. This comparison …
Dacia Sandero
Kia Stonic
VS
The Dacia Sandero and Kia Stonic target buyers who want compact practicality, but they take very different approaches — Sandero focuses on low cost and straightforward utility while the Stonic offers more style, features and refinement. This quick comparison highlights where each model shines so …
Hyundai i20
Kia Stonic
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai i20 and the Kia Stonic comes down to whether you value the i20’s refined hatchback driving dynamics and efficient packaging or the Stonic’s higher ride height, SUV-like presence and slightly more practical load space. I’ll compare their engines, interior space, …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX3
VS
The Audi Q4 e‑tron feels like the sensible, tech‑savvy choice — airy cabin, clever packaging and a polished, Scandinavian calm that suits family life and long commutes. The BMW iX3, by contrast, plays the sporty, driver‑centric card with taut handling and BMW polish, so pick the Q4 for everyday …
Kia Niro
Kia Stonic
VS
The Kia Niro and Kia Stonic step into the compact crossover ring with very different tricks up their sleeves — the Niro is the sensible, efficiency-first all-rounder, while the Stonic is the cheeky, city-savvy funster with a pocket-sized personality. Which one suits your life — long motorway miles …
Kia Sportage
Kia Stonic
VS
Kia Sportage and Kia Stonic go head-to-head in a battle of size and sense — one’s a roomy family SUV that eats motorways for breakfast, the other a scrappy city companion that squeezes into parking gaps like it’s a sport. If you need space, comfort and a bit of presence, pick the Sportage; if you …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Kia Stonic

Costs and Consumption
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Price
20,400 - 26,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
126 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
1,205 - 1,270 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
352 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
1,760 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
440 - 445 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
100 - 115 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.7 - 12.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
172 - 200 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
74 - 85 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
998 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Audi
Brand
Kia
Is the Audi Q4 e-tron offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.