@ Audi AG
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Skoda Kodiaq - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (340 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (39600 £ vs 36800 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or Skoda Kodiaq?

Audi Q4 e-tron

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron @ Audi AG

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Kodiaq has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 39600 £. That’s a price difference of around 2709 £.

As for range, the Audi Q4 e-tron performs decisively better – achieving up to 554 km, about 431 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron has a noticeable edge – offering 340 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 75 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.30 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs distinct better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Audi Q4 e-tron tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 51 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q4 e-tron pulls significantly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 279 Nm difference.

Q4 e-tron @ Audi AG

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is evident lighter – 1684 kg compared to 2035 kg. The difference is around 351 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers decisively more room – 910 L compared to 535 L. That’s a difference of about 375 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs clearly perceptible better – up to 2105 L, which is about 615 L more than the Audi Q4 e-tron.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq minimal takes the win – 563 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 48 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Audi Q4 e-tron shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £39,600
Q4 e-tron @ Audi AG

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.9 - 17.4 kWh
  • Electric Range : 406 - 554 km
details
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron brings Audi polish into the electric crossover scene, pairing a sleek exterior with a refined, airy interior that makes everyday driving feel distinctly premium. It’s an easy-to-live-with EV that balances comfort and real-world usability with intuitive tech, making it a smart choice for buyers who want electric mobility without giving up Audi character — and yes, it still looks good in the driveway.

details
A213272_overfull @ Audi AG
A213273_overfull @ Audi AG
A213248_overfull @ Audi AG
A213261_overfull @ Audi AG
A213263_overfull @ Audi AG
A213264_overfull @ Audi AG

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_45646 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Reviews Audi Q4 e-tron

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q4 e-tron
@ BMW Group Press
BMW iX1
VS
In the compact EV SUV showdown, the Audi Q4 e‑tron leans into classy understatement with a roomier, more refined interior and a smoother, long-distance friendly ride. The BMW iX1, meanwhile, trades some comfort for sportier handling and a livelier, driver-focused feel—pick the Q4 for comfort and …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Kodiaq
Q4 e-tron @ Audi AG
Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Consumption
Price
39600 - 58800 £
Price
36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.4 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
406 - 554 km
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
9 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2035 - 2235 kg
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity
520 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
4588 mm
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Width
1865 mm
Width
1864 mm
Height
1614 - 1632 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity
1460 - 1490 L
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2023 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the sensible grown-up: roomy, cleverly packaged and quietly refined for family life, while the Dacia Bigster bangs the value drum — massive interior and tough price tag, but fewer niceties. Choose the Kodiaq for long-term polish and smarter detailing; pick the Bigster if you …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Mercedes GLB
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q4 e-tron
@ Audi AG
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron is the tidy, city-smart EV that slips into tight parking spots, delivers sensible range and a friendly price, while the Audi Q6 e-tron turns up the luxury, space and tech — essentially a grown-up Q4 with more ambition and a bigger bill. Choose the Q4 for efficient, no-nonsense …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of family SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-60 impresses with its premium interior and dynamic driving experience, while the Kodiaq offers versatile space and impressive functionality, making it a …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q4 e-tron
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the Audi Q4 e-tron stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology, appealing to drivers seeking a luxurious experience. Meanwhile, the Skoda Elroq offers a more budget-friendly option without skimping on practicality and space, making it ideal for …
What drive types are available for the Audi Q4 e-tron?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.