VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs SsangYong Torres comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 207 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 33,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or SsangYong Torres?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs SsangYong Torres: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
details

SsangYong Torres

  • markedly cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

SsangYong Torres is markedly cheaper – starting at 33,800 £ , while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 40,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,866 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 18.7 kWh/100km for the SsangYong Torres. That’s a difference of about 3.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers clearly more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 130 km more than the SsangYong Torres.

Torres

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 207 HP. That’s roughly 133 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers significantly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 339 Nm. That’s about 340 Nm more.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, SsangYong Torres is noticeably lighter – 1,498 kg compared to 2,035 kg. The difference is around 537 kg.

Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Torres offers markedly more boot space – 703 L compared to 535 L. That’s a difference of about 168 L.

When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Torres carries barely more – 552 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 37 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,700
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 440 - 592 km
Audi Q4 e-tron
SsangYong Torres

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron brings Audi polish into the electric crossover scene, pairing a sleek exterior with a refined, airy interior that makes everyday driving feel distinctly premium. It’s an easy-to-live-with EV that balances comfort and real-world usability with intuitive tech, making it a smart choice for buyers who want electric mobility without giving up Audi character — and yes, it still looks good in the driveway.

details

SsangYong Torres

SsangYong Torres cuts a rugged, purposeful silhouette that feels more expensive than its price tag, offering generously practical packaging and a no-nonsense feature set. It drives with surprisingly assured manners and genuine off-road appetite, making it a clever choice for buyers who want real SUV capability without badge snobbery.

details
Audi Q4 e-tron
SsangYong Torres

Costs and Consumption

Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Price
33,800 - 44,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 9.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Electric Range
462 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 207 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,618 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
703 L
Length
-
Length
4,700 mm
Width
1,865 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
1,710 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,662 L
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
552 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
163 - 207 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
191 - 194 km/h
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
280 - 339 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
120 - 152 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Audi
Brand
SsangYong
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.