VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Volvo EX90 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 72,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or Volvo EX90?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Volvo EX90: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • markedly more efficient
  • markedly lighter
details

Volvo EX90

2.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • barely more electric range
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Audi Q4 e-tron is substantially cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the Volvo EX90 costs 72,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 31,448 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Audi Q4 e-tron is markedly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 17.8 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX90. That’s a difference of about 3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX90 offers barely more range – reaching up to 620 km, about 28 km more than the Audi Q4 e-tron.

EX90

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX90 offers considerably more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 340 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX90 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Audi Q4 e-tron takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX90 delivers visibly more torque with 870 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 191 Nm more.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Volvo EX90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q4 e-tron is markedly lighter – 2,035 kg compared to 2,555 kg. The difference is around 520 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX90 carries somewhat more – 605 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 90 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX90 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £72,200
EX90

Volvo EX90

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 333 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 570 - 620 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX90
Volvo EX60
VS
The Volvo EX90 and Volvo EX60 are Volvo's all-electric SUVs aimed at different buyers: the EX90 is the flagship full-size model focused on maximum space, safety and cutting-edge tech, while the EX60 is a mid-size alternative that prioritizes efficiency, agility and value. This comparison cuts …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX90

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details
A213272_overfull
A213273_overfull
A213248_overfull
A213261_overfull
A213263_overfull
A213264_overfull

Reviews Audi Q4 e-tron

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo EX90

The Volvo EX90 feels like a Scandinavian fortress on wheels, combining serene luxury with smart safety features that make everyday driving remarkably calm and confident. It dresses cutting-edge electric technology in understated elegance, so buyers who want peace of mind without shouting about it will find it hard to resist.

details
305698_Volvo_EX90
305699_Volvo_EX90
305702_Volvo_EX90
305707_Volvo_EX90
305714_Volvo_EX90
305743_Volvo_EX90

Reviews Volvo EX90

2.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
CHD
22 Apr 2026, 11:15:18

Full of faults — at least every other day there's something that needs to be fixed. Consumption 24 kWh/100 km in summer; in winter the range is half of what was promised. The safety would be good if the promised features actually worked.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX1 are compact electric SUVs that aim to balance everyday practicality with distinct brand characters — the Q4 e-tron leans toward refined comfort and a premium cabin, while the iX1 emphasizes sporty handling and tech-forward features. This comparison will walk you …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Kia EV3
VS
This comparison puts the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Kia EV3 head-to-head, contrasting Audi’s premium, tech-rich compact electric SUV with Kia’s practical, value-driven EV. Read on to see how they match up on range, comfort, features and running costs so you can choose the right electric car for your …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value Audi’s premium feel and refined driving experience or Skoda’s clever packaging and better value. The Q4 e-tron focuses on high-quality materials, tech and a composed ride, while the Elroq prioritises interior …
Audi Q4 e-tron
CUPRA Tavascan
VS
Here’s a head-to-head look at the Audi Q4 e-tron and the CUPRA Tavascan, two compact electric crossovers that blend practicality with distinctive styling. I’ll compare driving dynamics, range, interior quality and value to help you choose which fits your needs.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Kia EV5
VS
As compact electric SUVs, the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Kia EV5 take very different approaches: the Q4 e-tron emphasizes premium cabin materials, refined handling and Audi’s digital tech, while the EV5 aims for roomy practicality, strong value and competitive range at a lower price. I’ll compare …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX3
VS
The Audi Q4 e‑tron feels like the sensible, tech‑savvy choice — airy cabin, clever packaging and a polished, Scandinavian calm that suits family life and long commutes. The BMW iX3, by contrast, plays the sporty, driver‑centric card with taut handling and BMW polish, so pick the Q4 for everyday …
Volvo EX90
Volvo ES90
VS
The Volvo EX90 and Volvo ES90 are Volvo's newest premium electric models, each showcasing the brand's focus on safety, luxury and advanced electrified powertrains. The EX90 is the flagship electric SUV while the ES90 delivers similar technology in a more traditional sedan/fastback form, so your …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo XC60 means deciding whether you want a compact luxury SUV that’s fully electric or a versatile premium crossover available with petrol and hybrid options. The Q4 e-tron emphasizes electric range, tech and a refined cabin, while the XC60 leans on …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX90

Costs and Consumption
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Price
72,200 - 91,700 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Electric Range
570 - 620 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
6 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
2,555 - 2,765 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
1,964 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
545 - 605 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Volvo
Is the Audi Q4 e-tron offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.