VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Volvo XC90 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 74,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or Volvo XC90?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Volvo XC90: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • substantially more electric range
  • marginally lighter
details

Volvo XC90

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more power
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the Volvo XC90 costs 74,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 33,591 £.

As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers substantially more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 523 km more than the Volvo XC90.

XC90

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 offers moderately more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 66 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 5.4 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers only slightly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 669 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Volvo XC90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q4 e-tron is marginally lighter – 2,035 kg compared to 2,080 kg. The difference is around 45 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC90 carries markedly more – 710 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 195 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,700
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 440 - 592 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron serves up German poise, refined finishes and a composed highway ride that says "premium" without shouting, while the Volvo EX40 counters with Scandinavian simplicity, clever safety tech and a sprightlier city demeanour. Choose the Q4 for serene comfort and perceived luxury, or …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
In the compact EV SUV showdown, the Audi Q4 e‑tron leans into classy understatement with a roomier, more refined interior and a smoother, long-distance friendly ride. The BMW iX1, meanwhile, trades some comfort for sportier handling and a livelier, driver-focused feel—pick the Q4 for comfort and …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo XC90

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron brings Audi polish into the electric crossover scene, pairing a sleek exterior with a refined, airy interior that makes everyday driving feel distinctly premium. It’s an easy-to-live-with EV that balances comfort and real-world usability with intuitive tech, making it a smart choice for buyers who want electric mobility without giving up Audi character — and yes, it still looks good in the driveway.

details
A213272_overfull
A213273_overfull
A213248_overfull
A213261_overfull
A213263_overfull
A213264_overfull

Reviews Audi Q4 e-tron

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo XC90

The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.

details
294665_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue
294657_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue
294651_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue
248324_XC90_Plug-In_Hybrid_Inscription_T8_-_Seat_Configuration
294870_XC90_Recharge_interior

Reviews Volvo XC90

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Borstel
11 Nov 2025, 12:59:12

I drive both cars. The XC90’s boot is — contrary to the figures posted here — noticeably larger than the GLC’s when carrying five people. Overall the XC90 is clearly the more comfortable and, above all, the more stable — and therefore the safer — car.

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Packed into a compact electric package, the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers premium polish and slick tech while the Skoda Elroq plays the clever-value card with roomy practicality and a friendlier price tag. Which one should sit in your garage — the status-savvy Q4 e-tron or the no-nonsense Elroq? We’ll …
Audi Q4 e-tron
CUPRA Tavascan
VS
Here’s a head-to-head look at the Audi Q4 e-tron and the CUPRA Tavascan, two compact electric crossovers that blend practicality with distinctive styling. I’ll compare driving dynamics, range, interior quality and value to help you choose which fits your needs.
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX3
VS
The Audi Q4 e‑tron feels like the sensible, tech‑savvy choice — airy cabin, clever packaging and a polished, Scandinavian calm that suits family life and long commutes. The BMW iX3, by contrast, plays the sporty, driver‑centric card with taut handling and BMW polish, so pick the Q4 for everyday …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Ford Explorer EV
VS
In a compelling showdown between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Ford Explorer EV, both vehicles showcase impressive electric capabilities tailored to different lifestyle needs. The Q4 e-tron offers a luxurious interior filled with high-tech features and a spirited performance, while the Explorer EV …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Tesla Model Y
VS
In the increasingly competitive electric SUV market, the Audi Q4 e-tron and Tesla Model Y offer distinct experiences for eco-conscious drivers. The Audi Q4 e-tron stands out with its luxurious interior craftsmanship and advanced infotainment system, catering to those who prioritize comfort and …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BYD Sealion 7
VS
In the burgeoning electric vehicle segment, the Audi Q4 e-tron impresses with its premium build quality and exceptional handling, embodying the German automaker's commitment to luxury and performance. On the other hand, the BYD Sealion 7 offers an intriguing alternative, providing outstanding range …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo XC90

Costs and Consumption
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Price
74,300 - 84,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
3.4 - 8.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Electric Range
69 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
71 - 188 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
2,080 - 2,350 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
1,923 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
600 - 710 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
250 - 406 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
360 - 669 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
184 - 299 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Audi
Brand
Volvo
Is the Audi Q4 e-tron offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.