@ Audi AG
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
VS

Audi Q6 e-tron vs Skoda Kodiaq – Which model is better for everyday use?

Two cars, one duel: Audi Q6 e-tron meets Skoda Kodiaq.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q6 e-tron @ Audi AG

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Kodiaq has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Audi Q6 e-tron costs 54400 £. That’s a price difference of around 17580 £.

As for range, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs significantly better – achieving up to 656 km, about 533 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q6 e-tron has a decisively edge – offering 490 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 225 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q6 e-tron is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4.40 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.30 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Audi Q6 e-tron tops out at 230 km/h. The difference is around 1 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q6 e-tron pulls convincingly stronger with 855 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 455 Nm difference.

Q6 e-tron @ Audi AG

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is clearly perceptible lighter – 1684 kg compared to 2200 kg. The difference is around 516 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers significantly more room – 910 L compared to 526 L. That’s a difference of about 384 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs noticeable better – up to 2105 L, which is about 576 L more than the Audi Q6 e-tron.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq minimal takes the win – 563 kg compared to 540 kg. That’s a difference of about 23 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Audi Q6 e-tron proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Audi Q6 e-tron is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £54,400
Q6 e-tron @ Audi AG

Audi Q6 e-tron

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 252 - 490 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.6 - 18.9 kWh
  • Electric Range : 482 - 656 km
details

Audi Q6 e-tron

5 (2)
rate

The Audi Q6 e-tron balances sleek, coupe-like styling with a roomy, upscale interior that feels modern without being showy. It delivers refined electric performance and smart tech that make daily driving effortless — the sort of EV that might make petrolheads grudgingly admit they fancy the future.

details
A242848_medium @ Audi AG
A242855_medium @ Audi AG
A244272_medium @ Audi AG

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1)
rate

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_45646 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Top Car Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the sensible grown-up: roomy, cleverly packaged and quietly refined for family life, while the Dacia Bigster bangs the value drum — massive interior and tough price tag, but fewer niceties. Choose the Kodiaq for long-term polish and smarter detailing; pick the Bigster if you …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Skoda Kodiaq
Q6 e-tron @ Audi AG
Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Consumption
Price
54400 - 91900 £
Price
36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 - 18.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
482 - 656 km
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
9 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2200 - 2425 kg
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
4771 mm
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Width
1939 - 1965 mm
Width
1864 mm
Height
1665 - 1685 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity
1361 - 1529 L
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Payload
540 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
210 - 230 km/h
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Mercedes GLB
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q4 e-tron
@ Audi AG
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron is the tidy, city-smart EV that slips into tight parking spots, delivers sensible range and a friendly price, while the Audi Q6 e-tron turns up the luxury, space and tech — essentially a grown-up Q4 with more ambition and a bigger bill. Choose the Q4 for efficient, no-nonsense …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
VS
In the fiercely competitive SUV segment, the Skoda Kodiaq and Toyota RAV4 stand out for their impressive combination of space, comfort, and technology. While the Kodiaq boasts a more versatile interior with configurable seating options, the RAV4 offers a reputation for reliability and superior fuel …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q6 e-tron
@ BMW Group Press
BMW iX
VS
The Audi Q6 e-tron feels like a precision-engineered salon on wheels—sleeker, more driver-focused, with crisp handling and an interior that whispers luxury rather than shouts it. The BMW iX is the bigger, bolder statement: cavernous, supremely comfortable and range-minded; pick the Q6 for the …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q6 e-tron
@ BMW Group Press
BMW iX3
VS
The Audi Q6 e-tron is a tech-drenched grand tourer with a hushed cabin and long-range ambitions, while the BMW iX3 is a down-to-earth EV that favours agility, efficiency and sensible value. If you crave futuristic luxury and motorway composure, go Q6 e-tron; if you want sharper handling, everyday …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Touran
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Skoda Kodiaq and the VW Touran, both models showcase exceptional versatility but cater to slightly different audiences. The Kodiaq, with its bold SUV design and spacious three-row seating, is perfect for families and adventure seekers, while the Touran offers a …
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q6 e-tron have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.