Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi Q6 e-tron vs Volvo EC40 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (490 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (54400 £ vs 46600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q6 e-tron or Volvo EC40?
Q6 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Volvo EC40 has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 46600 £ , while the Audi Q6 e-tron costs 54400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7808 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Audi Q6 e-tron: with 15.60 kWh per 100 km, it’s barely noticeable more efficient than the Volvo EC40 with 16.20 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.60 kWh.
As for electric range, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs a bit better – achieving up to 656 km, about 72 km more than the Volvo EC40.
EC40
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q6 e-tron has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 490 HP compared to 442 HP. That’s roughly 48 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q6 e-tron is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 4.40 s, while the Volvo EC40 takes 4.60 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs evident better – reaching 230 km/h, while the Volvo EC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q6 e-tron pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 855 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 185 Nm difference.
Q6 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Volvo EC40 is slight lighter – 2065 kg compared to 2200 kg. The difference is around 135 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers distinct more room – 526 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 122 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs distinct better – up to 1529 L, which is about 333 L more than the Volvo EC40.
When it comes to payload, Audi Q6 e-tron somewhat takes the win – 540 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 105 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q6 e-tron is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Audi Q6 e-tron
Volvo EC40
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £54,400
Audi Q6 e-tron
Audi Q6 e-tron
4.9 (3 Reviews)
The Audi Q6 e-tron balances sleek, coupe-like styling with a roomy, upscale interior that feels modern without being showy. It delivers refined electric performance and smart tech that make daily driving effortless — the sort of EV that might make petrolheads grudgingly admit they fancy the future.
details
Volvo EC40
4.7 (1 Reviews)
The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.
details
Audi Q6 e-tron
Volvo EC40
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
54400 - 91900 £
|
Price
46600 - 59000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 - 18.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
482 - 656 km
|
Electric Range
488 - 584 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2200 - 2425 kg
|
Curb weight
2065 - 2185 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
|
Trunk capacity
404 L
|
|
Length
4771 mm
|
Length
4440 mm
|
|
Width
1939 - 1965 mm
|
Width
1873 mm
|
|
Height
1665 - 1685 mm
|
Height
1591 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1361 - 1529 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1196 L
|
|
Payload
540 kg
|
Payload
395 - 435 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 230 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Volvo
|
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q6 e-tron have?
Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.