Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi Q8 e-tron vs Skoda Enyaq comparison
Compare performance (503 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (65,100 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q8 e-tron or Skoda Enyaq?
Audi Q8 e-tron vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Q8 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Enyaq is considerably cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Audi Q8 e-tron costs 65,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 28,209 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is visibly more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 19.7 kWh/100km for the Audi Q8 e-tron. That’s a difference of about 4.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 595 km, about 6 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers noticeably more power – delivering 503 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 163 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q8 e-tron is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q8 e-tron delivers markedly more torque with 973 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 294 Nm more.
Q8 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is markedly lighter – 2,074 kg compared to 2,585 kg. The difference is around 511 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers marginally more boot space – 585 L compared to 569 L. That’s a difference of about 16 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q8 e-tron carries slightly more – 595 kg compared to 526 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,800
Skoda Enyaq
Audi Q8 e-tron
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q8 e-tron
The Audi Q8 e-tron wraps Audi’s usual premium polish into a quiet, composed electric SUV that feels refined and surprisingly effortless to drive. With a spacious, tech-forward cabin and understated road presence, it’s a practical yet stylish choice for buyers who want electric motoring without losing the dignity of a proper luxury SUV.
details
Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.
details
Audi Q8 e-tron
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
65,100 - 102,800 £
|
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.7 - 26.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
456 - 595 km
|
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
89 - 106 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,585 - 2,725 kg
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
528 - 569 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4,915 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,937 - 1,994 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
1,617 - 1,683 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,567 - 1,637 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
515 - 595 kg
|
Payload
449 - 526 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
340 - 503 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
664 - 973 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
250 - 370 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.