VS

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer vs Ford Puma – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW 2 Series Active Tourer or Ford Puma?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Puma has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer costs 31000 £. That’s a price difference of around 6257 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: BMW 2 Series Active Tourer manages with 0.90 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 4.50 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Ford Puma performs significantly better – achieving up to 376 km, about 291 km more than the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer.

Engine and Performance: Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer has a clearly edge – offering 326 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 158 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 5.50 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer performs slightly better – reaching 238 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 28 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: BMW 2 Series Active Tourer pulls distinct stronger with 477 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 187 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use: Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is to a small extent lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1545 kg. The difference is around 229 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers slightly more room – 523 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 53 L.

In maximum load capacity, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer performs a bit better – up to 1455 L, which is about 172 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, BMW 2 Series Active Tourer slight takes the win – 505 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 36 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £31,000
P90305272_highRes_the-new-bmw-2-series

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 122 - 326 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.9 - 6.2 L
  • Electric Range : 85 km
details

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer

The BMW 2 Series Active Tourer offers a blend of versatility and modern design, making it an ideal choice for drivers seeking practicality without compromising on style. Its spacious interior and advanced technology features ensure a comfortable and connected driving experience. With a focus on efficiency and performance, this vehicle stands out as a refined option in the compact MPV segment.

details
P90305272_highRes_the-new-bmw-2-series @ press.bmwgroup.com
P90305281_highRes_the-new-bmw-2-series @ press.bmwgroup.com
P90288931_highRes_the-new-bmw-2-series @ press.bmwgroup.com
P90288939_highRes_the-new-bmw-2-series @ press.bmwgroup.com

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday practicality, the ID.3 for smooth, emissions-free cruising and lower running costs — your wallet and the planet will thank you differently.
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
BMW X1
VS
The BMW 2 Series Active Tourer is the clever, family-focused MPV that swaps SUV posturing for genuinely useful space and a lower, car‑like ride, while the BMW X1 dresses up as a compact SUV with higher seating, tougher styling and a bit more composure on rutted roads. Pick the 2 Series for easy access, clever packaging and relaxed refinement; choose the X1 if you want presence, a firmer ride and the kind of image that makes neighbours do a double‑take.
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
Ford Puma
2 Series Active Tourer
Puma

Costs and Consumption
Price
31000 - 48000 £
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 6.2 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Electric Range
85 km
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Battery Capacity
14.20 kWh
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
co2
20 - 140 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 54 L
Fuel tank capacity
42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
MPV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1545 - 1920 kg
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Trunk capacity
406 - 470 L
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Length
4386 mm
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Width
1824 mm
Width
1805 mm
Height
1576 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Max trunk capacity
1370 - 1455 L
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Payload
465 - 505 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 - 326 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
195 - 238 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Torque
230 - 477 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
90 - 240 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
1499 - 1998 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
Brand
BMW
Brand
Ford

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising range, a spacious interior and brilliant value, making it the smarter, cleaner pick for everyday running.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Corsa
VS
In the highly competitive compact car segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its robust styling and dynamic driving performance, offering a sporty edge perfect for city and country roads alike. In contrast, the Vauxhall Corsa impresses with its practical design and tech-forward interior, appealing to those who prioritize efficiency and comfort in a more streamlined package. Ultimately, the choice between the Puma and Corsa hinges on whether your preference leans towards spirited driving or urban practicality.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Frontera
VS
In the latest showdown between the Ford Puma and Opel Frontera, performance enthusiasts will find the Puma's sleek design and nimble handling a stark contrast to the Frontera's rugged off-road capabilities. While the Puma excels in urban agility and fuel efficiency, the Frontera stands out for its durability and versatility in challenging terrains. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on personal lifestyle needs, with the Puma appealing more to city drivers and the Frontera capturing the spirit of adventure seekers.
Ford Focus
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma stands out with its stylish design and versatility, offering a sportier feel while maintaining practicality for everyday use.
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma and the Renault 5 both offer unique appeals in the compact car segment. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a blend of style and performance. In contrast, the Renault 5 charms with its iconic retro design and efficient urban mobility, making it a beloved choice for city drivers who appreciate a touch of nostalgia with modern functionality.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Ford Puma
Peugeot 208
VS
In the compact crossover segment, the Ford Puma impresses with its dynamic design and agile handling, making it an attractive option for city dwellers seeking both style and practicality. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 208, known for its elegant interior and efficient engine options, offers a compelling blend of technology and comfort that appeals to urban drivers. Ultimately, choosing between the Puma and the 208 comes down to prioritizing either the sporty performance of the Ford or the sophisticated refinement of the Peugeot.
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both vehicles offer impressive tech features, but their differing approaches to style and functionality make this comparison a compelling one for potential buyers.
What drive types are available for the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.