Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BMW iX3 vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (469 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (59100 £ vs 22400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW iX3 or Renault Kangoo Compact Van?
iX3
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Renault Kangoo Compact Van has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 22400 £ , while the BMW iX3 costs 59100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 36617 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the BMW iX3: with 15.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s distinct more efficient than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van with 18.70 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.60 kWh.
As for electric range, the BMW iX3 performs significantly better – achieving up to 805 km, about 515 km more than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van.
Kangoo Compact Van
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW iX3 has a convincingly edge – offering 469 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 347 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW iX3 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 11.60 s. That’s about 6.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the BMW iX3 performs a bit better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van tops out at 176 km/h. The difference is around 34 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: BMW iX3 pulls clearly stronger with 645 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 375 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
iX3
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Renault Kangoo Compact Van is convincingly lighter – 1493 kg compared to 2360 kg. The difference is around 867 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van performs convincingly better – up to 4900 L, which is about 3150 L more than the BMW iX3.
When it comes to payload, Renault Kangoo Compact Van decisively takes the win – 901 kg compared to 465 kg. That’s a difference of about 436 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the BMW iX3 shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £59,100
BMW iX3
BMW iX3
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
BMW iX3
5 (1 Reviews)
The BMW iX3 brings BMW's familiar SUV poise into the electric era, blending restrained styling and a comfortable, composed ride that will please traditionalists dipping their toes into electrification. It's quiet, practical and rather grown-up about going electric — a sensible choice for buyers who want BMW driving manners without the drama.
details
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
The Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.
details
BMW iX3
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
59100 - 64600 £
|
Price
22400 - 37000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.10 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 21.1 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
805 km
|
Electric Range
261 - 290 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
108.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
2360 kg
|
Curb weight
1493 - 1910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
520 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4782 mm
|
Length
4486 - 4910 mm
|
|
Width
1895 mm
|
Width
1860 mm
|
|
Height
1635 mm
|
Height
1854 - 1864 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1750 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3000 - 4900 L
|
|
Payload
465 kg
|
Payload
498 - 901 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
469 HP
|
Power HP
75 - 122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.90 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 18.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 - 176 km/h
|
|
Torque
645 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
345 kW
|
Power kW
55 - 90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2022 - 2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Renault
|
What drive types are available for the BMW iX3?
The BMW iX3 is available as All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.