Compare performance (469 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (54,300 £ vs 46,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW iX3 or Volvo EC40?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The emergence of electric vehicles has reshaped the automotive landscape, and two noteworthy contenders in the all-electric SUV segment are the BMW iX3 and the Volvo EC40. In this article, we will delve into a detailed comparison of these two models, focusing on their technical specifications, innovative features, and overall appeal.
The BMW iX3 exhibits a classic SUV silhouette that is quintessentially BMW, with elegant lines and a bold front kidney grille. Its dimensions are impressive: measuring 4734 mm in length, 1891 mm in width, and 1668 mm in height, it offers a spacious interior designed to accommodate up to five passengers comfortably with a trunk capacity of 510 liters.
In contrast, the Volvo EC40 sports a more compact profile, measuring 4440 mm in length, 1873 mm in width, and 1591 mm in height. While it also provides ample room for five occupants, its trunk capacity of 404 liters is slightly less than that of the iX3. Nevertheless, the EC40's design emphasizes a modern aesthetic with a distinctive front fascia and a strong character line.
Both the BMW iX3 and the Volvo EC40 boast all-electric powertrains, making them efficient choices for environmentally-conscious consumers. The iX3 is equipped with a rear-wheel-drive setup and delivers a robust 286 horsepower (210 kW) with a torque of 400 Nm. It accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in a sprightly 6.8 seconds and achieves a top speed of 180 km/h. The vehicle features a battery capacity of 73.9 kWh, enabling a remarkable electric range of up to 471 km, with an energy consumption rate of 17.6 kWh/100km.
The Volvo EC40, on the other hand, offers more versatility with rear-wheel and all-wheel-drive options. Depending on the variant, it provides power outputs ranging from 238 HP (175 kW) to an impressive 408 HP (300 kW). The torque figures vary significantly, with the all-wheel-drive model reaching up to 670 Nm. Acceleration times are commendable; the fastest variant can achieve 0 to 100 km/h in just 4.6 seconds. The EC40 is available with two battery capacities: 67 kWh and 79 kWh, granting it an electric range of up to 584 km, with a consumption rate between 16.2 kWh and 17.3 kWh/100km, making it slightly more efficient than the iX3 in certain configurations.
Inside the iX3, BMW emphasizes a driver-centric approach, featuring high-quality materials, an intuitive layout, and the latest technology. The iDrive system with a large display provides easy access to navigation, media, and vehicle settings. Additionally, the cargo space is maximized with a practical rear seating arrangement that can be folded down for larger items.
The Volvo EC40 also boasts a stylish and functional interior, with a focus on sustainability through the use of eco-friendly materials. Its infotainment system is built around an impressive touchscreen interface, offering seamless connectivity and a range of applications. The EC40 engages passengers with its spacious cabin design, which prioritizes both comfort and functionality.
Safety is paramount in both vehicles, reflecting the brands' long-standing reputations for innovation in this domain. The BMW iX3 comes equipped with a suite of safety features, including advanced driver-assistance systems, collision detection, and adaptive cruise control.
Similarly, the Volvo EC40 is recognized for its safety standards, offering a comprehensive array of safety technologies synonymous with the brand. From advanced lane-keeping assistance to automatic emergency braking, the EC40 aims to provide peace of mind for drivers and passengers alike.
In conclusion, both the BMW iX3 and Volvo EC40 represent significant strides in the electric SUV market. The iX3 appeals with its robust performance, luxurious interior, and range capabilities, whereas the EC40 stands out for its impressive electric range, optional all-wheel drive, and cutting-edge technology. The choice between these two electric powerhouses will ultimately depend on individual preferences regarding performance, design, and technological features. Either way, consumers are presented with two world-class electric SUVs that contribute to a more sustainable future without compromising on style or comfort.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Volvo EC40 is a bit cheaper – starting at 46,500 £ , while the BMW iX3 costs 54,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,808 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the BMW iX3 is a bit more efficient: consuming 14.6 kWh/100km compared to 16.2 kWh/100km for the Volvo EC40. That’s a difference of about 1.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the BMW iX3 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 805 km, about 220 km more than the Volvo EC40.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW iX3 offers only slightly more power – delivering 469 HP compared to 442 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the BMW iX3 takes 4.9 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EC40 delivers only slightly more torque with 670 Nm compared to 645 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo EC40 is slightly lighter – 2,065 kg compared to 2,360 kg. The difference is around 295 kg.
When it comes to payload, the BMW iX3 carries marginally more – 465 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.
The BMW iX3 is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BMW iX3 is an electric SUV that delivers the composed, premium driving experience BMW buyers expect. With a calm, refined cabin and practical everyday usability, it’s a strong choice for those who want electric motoring without giving up luxury and comfort.
details
The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
54,300 - 66,300 £
|
Price
46,500 - 56,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 15.1 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
635 - 805 km
|
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,360 kg
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
404 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,895 mm
|
Width
1,873 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
465 kg
|
Payload
395 - 435 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
320 - 469 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
500 - 645 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
235 - 345 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España