Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BMW X3 vs Skoda Enyaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (398 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (51300 £ vs 38100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW X3 or Skoda Enyaq?
X3
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Enyaq has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38100 £ , while the BMW X3 costs 51300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13200 £.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs significantly better – achieving up to 587 km, about 499 km more than the BMW X3.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW X3 has a slightly edge – offering 398 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 58 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X3 is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 0.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the BMW X3 performs distinct better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 70 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls barely noticeable stronger with 679 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 9 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
X3
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, BMW X3 is hardly perceptible lighter – 1930 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 72 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers minimal more room – 585 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 15 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs barely noticeable better – up to 1710 L, which is about 10 L more than the BMW X3.
When it comes to payload, BMW X3 somewhat takes the win – 570 kg compared to 509 kg. That’s a difference of about 61 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Skoda Enyaq shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £38,100
Skoda Enyaq
BMW X3
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
BMW X3
4.6 (1 Reviews)
The BMW X3 mixes Bavarian poise with everyday practicality, delivering a composed ride and a cabin that feels both premium and lived-in. It’s the sort of SUV that lets you enjoy sporty handling without sacrificing family-friendly space, so you get fun and sense in one neat package.
details
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
BMW X3
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
51300 - 72400 £
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
88 km
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
|
co2
64 - 175 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 - 65 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1930 - 2140 kg
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
460 - 570 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4755 mm
|
Length
4658 mm
|
|
Width
1920 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1660 mm
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1700 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
|
Payload
570 kg
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
197 - 398 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
215 - 250 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
330 - 670 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
145 - 293 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1995 - 2998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drive types are available for the BMW X3?
The BMW X3 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.