VS

BMW X3 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (398 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (51,700 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW X3 or Skoda Enyaq?

BMW X3 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

BMW X3

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

X3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Enyaq is clearly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the BMW X3 costs 51,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,837 £.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers significantly more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 501 km more than the BMW X3.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW X3 offers somewhat more power – delivering 398 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 58 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X3 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers very slightly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 9 Nm more.

X3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, BMW X3 is very slightly lighter – 1,930 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 144 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers only slightly more boot space – 585 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 15 L.

When it comes to payload, the BMW X3 carries only slightly more – 570 kg compared to 526 kg. That’s a difference of about 44 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 449 - 589 km
BMW X3
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

BMW X3

The BMW X3 blends sporty handling with premium comfort, making it a strong choice for drivers who want an engaging everyday SUV. Its well-appointed interior and confident road manners give it broad appeal for families and commuters who value style and versatility.

details

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
BMW X3
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
51,700 - 73,000 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
88 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
64 - 175 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,930 - 2,140 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
460 - 570 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,920 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
570 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
197 - 398 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
330 - 670 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
145 - 293 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
BMW
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.