VS

BMW X3 vs Suzuki S-Cross comparison

Compare performance (398 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (51,700 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW X3 or Suzuki S-Cross?

BMW X3 vs Suzuki S-Cross: Key differences

BMW X3

3.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

X3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Suzuki S-Cross is considerably cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the BMW X3 costs 51,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 29,923 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW X3 uses 2.8 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Suzuki S-Cross with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.

S-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW X3 offers clearly more power – delivering 398 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 288 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X3 delivers substantially more torque with 670 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 435 Nm more.

X3

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is considerably lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,930 kg. The difference is around 650 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BMW X3 offers noticeably more boot space – 570 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 140 L.

When it comes to payload, the BMW X3 carries clearly more – 570 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 165 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW X3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £51,700
X3

BMW X3

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 197 - 398 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 7.7 L/100km
  • Electric Range 88 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Toyota Yaris Cross are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV practicality in a city-friendly package. The S-Cross leans toward space and straightforward value, while the Yaris Cross prioritises hybrid efficiency, urban agility and advanced safety tech—so pick …
BMW X3
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW X3

The BMW X3 blends sporty handling with premium comfort, making it a strong choice for drivers who want an engaging everyday SUV. Its well-appointed interior and confident road manners give it broad appeal for families and commuters who value style and versatility.

details
P90444059_highRes_bmw-x3-xdrive30d-11-
P90424715_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv
P90424688_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv
P90424707_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv
P90424709_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv

Reviews BMW X3

3.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Franck
3 Aug 2026, 09:01:46

I've been driving an X3 30e for a year. Vibration problems that BMW can't resolve and ultimately considers everything normal, even though an independent assessment says otherwise.
Too firm despite the adaptive suspension (20-inch wheels).
Excessive road/rolling noise.
Finish and presentation quality deplorable for a vehicle at this price.
The personal assistant is less effective than on my previous X3 (G01).

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Peter
24 Aug 2026, 23:05:21

Value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Frequently compared as well

BMW X3
VW Tayron
VS
The BMW X3 and the Volkswagen Tayron occupy the same compact-SUV territory but take different approaches: the X3 emphasizes sporty handling and premium refinement while the Tayron focuses on practicality, interior space and value. This quick comparison will cut through the specs to show which model …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
BMW 5 Series Touring
BMW X3
VS
The BMW 5 Series Touring and the BMW X3 pit estate practicality against compact SUV versatility, giving buyers a clear choice between low-slung refinement and higher-riding utility. Choose the 5 Series Touring if you prioritise cargo space, on-road comfort and a more car-like driving feel; pick the …
Hyundai Kona
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
The Kona and S‑Cross are compact crossovers that blend city‑friendly dimensions with SUV practicality. This comparison highlights the key differences in styling, interior space, powertrains, fuel economy and running costs to help you choose which suits your needs.
Skoda Karoq
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
The Skoda Karoq and Suzuki S‑Cross are compact crossover SUVs aimed at buyers who want a practical, comfortable daily driver with a raised seating position and SUV versatility. This comparison focuses on interior space, comfort, driving dynamics, equipment and running costs to help you decide which …
Hyundai Tucson
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Comparing the Hyundai Tucson and the Suzuki S‑Cross: both are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want practicality and low running costs, but they take different approaches — the Tucson leans toward space, comfort and technology, while the S‑Cross focuses on affordability, simplicity and efficiency. …
BMW 3 Series Touring
BMW X3
VS
The BMW 3 Series Touring and the BMW X3 both bring BMW's driving focus to practical buyers — the 3 Series Touring is a sporty station wagon, while the X3 is a compact SUV with higher ride height and greater versatility. Which suits you depends on priorities: the Touring leans to sharper handling …
BMW X3
BMW iX3
VS
In the battle of luxury SUVs, the BMW X3 and its electric counterpart, the BMW iX3, showcase the brand's commitment to performance and innovation. While the X3 continues to impress with its powerful engine options and dynamic handling, the iX3 offers an eco-friendly driving experience without …
BMW X3
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
51,700 - 73,000 £
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
88 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
64 - 175 g/km
co2
119 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,930 - 2,140 kg
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Trunk capacity
460 - 570 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,920 mm
Width
1,785 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
570 kg
Payload
395 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
197 - 398 HP
Power HP
110 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
330 - 670 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
145 - 293 kW
Power kW
81 kW
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
BMW
Brand
Suzuki
Is the BMW X3 offered with different drivetrains?

The BMW X3 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.