Two cars, one duel: Skoda Kamiq meets Suzuki S-Cross.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
In the ever-growing SUV market, the 2024 models of the Skoda Kamiq and the Suzuki S-Cross stand out as top contenders. Both vehicles offer a blend of style, performance, and practicality. Let's dive deeper into their technical specifications and innovations to see how they stack up against each other.
The Skoda Kamiq offers a range of petrol engines with power outputs of 95, 115, and 150 HP, allowing drivers to choose based on their performance needs. The engine options include both 3-cylinder and 4-cylinder configurations, with engine capacities of 999 cm3 and 1498 cm3, respectively. The Kamiq features both manual and automatic transmissions with a dual-clutch automatic option, and is strictly front-wheel drive.
On the other hand, the Suzuki S-Cross presents a unique choice between a Full Hybrid and Petrol MHEV engine. The power outputs are slightly less varied, with options for 116 and 129 HP. The S-Cross offers both front-wheel drive and the versatility of all-wheel drive. Additionally, its engine capacity lies between 1373 cm3 and 1462 cm3.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Skoda Kamiq delivers consumption rates ranging from 5.4 to 5.7 liters per 100 km, making it a competitive choice in terms of cost-effectiveness and emissions, with CO2 output ranging from 121 to 130 g/km.
The Suzuki S-Cross also impresses with a consumption rate between 5.1 and 5.8 liters per 100 km, showcasing its efficiency, especially for urban and mixed driving scenarios. Its CO2 emissions span from 116 to 131 g/km, aligning closely with the Kamiq's performance in terms of environmental impact.
For those who value speed, the Skoda Kamiq offers a range in maximum speed from 183 km/h to an impressive 214 km/h and accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h between 8.3 seconds and 11 seconds, varying by engine choice. This makes it appealing for drivers looking for a nimble city car that can hold its own on the highway.
The Suzuki S-Cross, while slightly more modest in speed, has a maximum of 195 km/h and accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 9.5 seconds, providing a smooth and reliable performance that suits daily commuting and family outings.
In terms of size, the Skoda Kamiq measures 4241 mm in length, 1793 mm in width, and 1562 mm in height. It offers a trunk capacity of 400 liters, which is more than sufficient for everyday use.
The Suzuki S-Cross, with dimensions of 4300 mm length, 1785 mm width, and 1580 mm height, offers a slightly larger trunk capacity of 430 liters, catering to those who may require additional cargo space.
Both the Skoda Kamiq and the Suzuki S-Cross present attractive features tailored to a contemporary lifestyle. The Kamiq thrives on offering multiple engine choices and superior speed, while the S-Cross provides hybrid options and the flexibility of all-wheel drive. Purchasing decisions for potential buyers will depend largely on preferences for engine type, efficiency, and specific driving needs.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Kamiq has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21700 £, while the Suzuki S-Cross costs 21800 £. That’s a price difference of around 51 £.
Both cars consume an average of 5.30 L per 100 km – no difference here.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kamiq has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 150 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kamiq performs somewhat better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Suzuki S-Cross tops out at 185 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kamiq pulls slight stronger with 250 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is barely noticeable lighter – 1231 kg compared to 1280 kg. The difference is around 49 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Suzuki S-Cross offers barely noticeable more room – 430 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kamiq performs somewhat better – up to 1395 L, which is about 165 L more than the Suzuki S-Cross.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kamiq distinct takes the win – 539 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 134 kg.
Overall, the Skoda Kamiq shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
The Suzuki S-Cross is a neatly packaged crossover that puts everyday practicality ahead of showy theatrics, offering a comfortable cabin and predictable handling that suit family life and weekend errands alike. It’s not a headline-grabber, but its sensible packaging, low-key charm and reputation for reliability make it a shrewd choice for buyers who prefer smart value over flash.
details
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21700 - 31900 £
|
Price
21800 - 34200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
co2
119 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1231 - 1340 kg
|
Curb weight
1280 - 1385 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
Trunk capacity
430 L
|
|
Length
4241 mm
|
Length
4305 mm
|
|
Width
1793 mm
|
Width
1785 mm
|
|
Height
1562 mm
|
Height
1580 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1395 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1230 L
|
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Payload
395 - 405 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
110 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 185 km/h
|
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
235 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
81 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1373 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España