VS

BMW XM vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (748 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (116,100 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW XM or Renault Arkana?

BMW XM vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

BMW XM

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XM

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Arkana is considerably cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the BMW XM costs 116,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 87,685 £.

Both cars consume an average of 4.7 L/100km – no difference here.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW XM offers substantially more power – delivering 748 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 605 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW XM is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW XM delivers considerably more torque with 1,000 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 795 Nm more.

XM

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: BMW XM offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is clearly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 2,695 kg. The difference is around 1,185 kg.

When it comes to payload, the BMW XM carries somewhat more – 525 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 74 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW XM is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £116,100
XM

BMW XM

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 476 - 748 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.7 - 5.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range 78 - 80 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Arkana
VS
The Qashqai and Arkana are two compact SUVs that take different approaches: the Qashqai focuses on everyday practicality and comfort, while the Arkana trades a bit of rear space for a sportier, coupe-like profile and distinctive style. I’ll compare them on the things that matter—space and …
BMW XM
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW XM

The BMW XM is an unapologetically bold flagship that fuses brash, hyper-styled presence with the kind of luxury that commands attention wherever it goes. Inside it's a leather-clad showpiece loaded with modern tech and a driving personality that blends theatrical muscle with refined grand-tourer composure—ideal for buyers who want drama and comfort in equal measure.

details
P90478657_highRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x
P90478646_highRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x
P90478549_lowRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x
P90478580_lowRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x

Reviews BMW XM

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Rafale represent two different takes on Renault's crossover line-up: the Arkana is a compact, value-focused coupe-SUV, while the Rafale aims higher as a larger, more premium fastback crossover packed with technology. This comparison strips away the marketing to help …
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
Choosing between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Austral comes down to whether you want a coupe‑styled compact SUV that prioritises flair and efficiency (Arkana) or a more conventional family SUV that emphasises space and refinement (Austral). This comparison will cut through the marketing to …
Renault Arkana
Toyota C-HR
VS
Renault Arkana and Toyota C-HR go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Renault Arkana or the …
Ford Kuga
Renault Arkana
VS
In the competitive crossover SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Renault Arkana present two distinct approaches to style and capability. The Ford Kuga impresses with its versatile engine options and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for family-oriented buyers. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana …
Renault Arkana
Renault Captur
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Captur are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want a blend of stylish design, efficient engines and everyday practicality. The Arkana leans into a sleeker coupe‑SUV look and a firmer driving feel, while the Captur favours flexible interior packaging and …
BMW X5
BMW XM
VS
The BMW X5, known for its versatility and luxurious comfort, appeals to those seeking a balanced blend of performance and practicality. In contrast, the BMW XM stands out with its distinctive styling and hybrid powertrain, offering a more avant-garde experience aimed at drivers who prioritize …
Peugeot 408
Renault Arkana
VS
In the burgeoning world of crossover SUVs, the Peugeot 408 and Renault Arkana both offer distinctive styles and robust performance. The Peugeot 408 captivates with its sharp design and intuitive technology features, providing a smooth yet dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana …
Hyundai Tucson
Renault Arkana
VS
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson and Renault Arkana both stand out but for different reasons. The Hyundai Tucson offers a spacious interior with a tech-savvy approach, providing a comfortable ride with its robust safety features and advanced entertainment system. On the …
BMW XM
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
116,100 - 159,300 £
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
78 - 80 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 119 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,695 - 2,795 kg
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Trunk capacity
527 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,005 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 525 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
476 - 748 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 5.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
700 - 1,000 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
350 - 550 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
2,998 - 4,395 cm3
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
BMW
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the BMW XM?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.