VS

BYD Atto 3 vs MINI Aceman comparison

Compare performance (449 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (38,600 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or MINI Aceman?

BYD Atto 3 vs MINI Aceman: Key differences

BYD Atto 3

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • visibly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • somewhat more efficient
  • only slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Atto 3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

MINI Aceman is significantly cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the BYD Atto 3 costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,562 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is somewhat more efficient: consuming 14.1 kWh/100km compared to 16.4 kWh/100km for the BYD Atto 3. That’s a difference of about 2.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the BYD Atto 3 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 510 km, about 155 km more than the MINI Aceman.

Aceman

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers substantially more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 191 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.4 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Atto 3 delivers visibly more torque with 560 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 210 Nm more.

Atto 3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MINI Aceman is only slightly lighter – 1,720 kg compared to 1,880 kg. The difference is around 160 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BYD Atto 3 offers noticeably more boot space – 490 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 190 L.

Maximum payload is identical – both can carry up to 530 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BYD Atto 3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,600
Atto 3

BYD Atto 3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 313 - 449 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 510 km
BYD Atto 3
MINI Aceman

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

BYD Atto 3

The BYD Atto 3 is an electric crossover that blends a distinctive, modern design with a comfortable, well-equipped cabin suited to everyday family use. It offers a relaxed, smooth driving feel and practical running costs, making it a sensible choice if you want an uncomplicated, value-focused EV.

details

MINI Aceman

The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.

details
BYD Atto 3
MINI Aceman

Costs and Consumption

Price
38,600 - 43,700 £
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
Electric Range
470 - 510 km
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,880 - 1,990 kg
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
Trunk capacity
490 L
Trunk capacity
300 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,875 mm
Width
1,754 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
530 kg
Payload
450 - 530 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
313 - 449 HP
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 560 Nm
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
230 - 330 kW
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
BYD
Brand
MINI
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.