VS

BYD Atto 3 vs Suzuki S-Cross comparison

Compare performance (449 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (38,600 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or Suzuki S-Cross?

BYD Atto 3 vs Suzuki S-Cross: Key differences

BYD Atto 3

4.1 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • slightly more trunk space
details

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Atto 3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Suzuki S-Cross is considerably cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the BYD Atto 3 costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,800 £.

S-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers considerably more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 339 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Atto 3 delivers significantly more torque with 560 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 325 Nm more.

Atto 3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is substantially lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,880 kg. The difference is around 600 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BYD Atto 3 offers slightly more boot space – 490 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 60 L.

When it comes to payload, the BYD Atto 3 carries clearly more – 530 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BYD Atto 3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,600
Atto 3

BYD Atto 3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 313 - 449 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 510 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Toyota Yaris Cross are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV practicality in a city-friendly package. The S-Cross leans toward space and straightforward value, while the Yaris Cross prioritises hybrid efficiency, urban agility and advanced safety tech—so pick …
BYD Atto 3
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BYD Atto 3

The BYD Atto 3 is an electric crossover that blends a distinctive, modern design with a comfortable, well-equipped cabin suited to everyday family use. It offers a relaxed, smooth driving feel and practical running costs, making it a sensible choice if you want an uncomplicated, value-focused EV.

details
5F27650C-A457-4BA8-ABBF-B0A381081F50
4CD0D607-8DF0-480E-92A0-FFE2DD0C2A7D
A4BCEC5F-F54A-4C81-8C3B-2C7767DF6D72
E96AFF07-FF39-4455-88FE-E60F4D607FE6
AD877C78-5875-44DA-B1B6-1E99A05AC058

Reviews BYD Atto 3

4.1 (7 Reviews)
rate
Marinos manolessos
21 Jun 2026, 19:22:18

More quicker better price better equipped rwd move

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
BERNARD
17 Apr 2026, 12:36:55

It seems to better meet my expectations when it comes to fuel economy and overall efficiency.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
The Kona and S‑Cross are compact crossovers that blend city‑friendly dimensions with SUV practicality. This comparison highlights the key differences in styling, interior space, powertrains, fuel economy and running costs to help you choose which suits your needs.
Ford Kuga
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Comparing the Ford Kuga and the Suzuki S‑Cross helps you decide between a bigger, more tech-rich family SUV and a compact, practical crossover that’s easier on the wallet. Below is a direct, practical breakdown to help match each car to real-life needs. Quick verdict - Ford Kuga: A more spacious, …
Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Across
VS
Here’s a straight-talk comparison of the Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Across to help you decide which crossover suits your lifestyle and budget. The S-Cross is a practical, affordable compact crossover focused on efficiency and comfort, while the Across is a larger plug-in hybrid with stronger …
BYD Atto 3
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Meet BYD's feisty duo: the Atto 3 — a cheeky, city-friendly compact crossover — takes on the Sealion 7, a sleeker, more spacious contender that aims to blend family practicality with a touch of flair. Which one wins your garage comes down to whether you crave nimble urban fun or roomy long-range …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
BYD Atto 3
BYD Atto 2
VS
Choosing between the BYD Atto 3 and BYD Atto 2 comes down to whether you need more range, space and performance or a smaller, more affordable city EV. The Atto 3 delivers stronger power, longer driving range and more interior room, while the Atto 2 focuses on compact dimensions, efficiency and …
Dacia Duster
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Choosing between the Dacia Duster and the Suzuki S-Cross is about whether you want rugged simplicity and great value or a more refined, comfortable compact crossover. This comparison will focus on real-world space, economy, driving feel and running costs to help you decide which suits your needs.
BYD Atto 3
Skoda Elroq
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and the Skoda Elroq brings together a tech-forward Chinese electric crossover and a more traditionally engineered European compact SUV. I’ll highlight the key differences in driving range, interior space, features and running costs so you can quickly see which one fits your …
BYD Atto 3
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
38,600 - 43,700 £
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
470 - 510 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
119 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,880 - 1,990 kg
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Trunk capacity
490 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,875 mm
Width
1,785 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
530 kg
Payload
395 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
313 - 449 HP
Power HP
110 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 560 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
230 - 330 kW
Power kW
81 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
BYD
Brand
Suzuki
Is the BYD Atto 3 offered with different drivetrains?

The BYD Atto 3 is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.