VS

BYD Atto 3 vs VW T-Roc comparison

Compare performance (449 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (33,400 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or VW T-Roc?

BYD Atto 3 vs VW T-Roc: Key differences

BYD Atto 3

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space

VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • noticeably lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Atto 3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW T-Roc is noticeably cheaper – starting at 26,400 £ , while the BYD Atto 3 costs 33,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,982 £.

T-Roc

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers clearly more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 299 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Atto 3 delivers clearly more torque with 560 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 310 Nm more.

Atto 3

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Roc is noticeably lighter – 1,465 kg compared to 1,825 kg. The difference is around 360 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BYD Atto 3 offers visibly more boot space – 440 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 156 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries clearly more – 515 kg compared to 335 kg. That’s a difference of about 180 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BYD Atto 3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,400
Atto 3

BYD Atto 3

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 449 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 420 - 510 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Atto 3
BYD Atto 2
VS
In the battle of BYD's innovative electric vehicles, the Atto 3 emerges as a more advanced contender compared to the Atto 2. With its sleek design, improved range, and enhanced technology features, the Atto 3 not only offers better performance but also caters to the growing demand for eco-friendly …
Lexus LBX
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
BYD Atto 3
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BYD Atto 3

The BYD Atto 3 mixes quirky crossover styling with a cleverly packaged interior that feels more premium than its price suggests. Easy to drive, surprisingly practical and loaded with user-friendly tech, it's a strong choice for buyers who want an EV that's fun without being fussy.

details
5F27650C-A457-4BA8-ABBF-B0A381081F50
4CD0D607-8DF0-480E-92A0-FFE2DD0C2A7D
A4BCEC5F-F54A-4C81-8C3B-2C7767DF6D72
E96AFF07-FF39-4455-88FE-E60F4D607FE6
AD877C78-5875-44DA-B1B6-1E99A05AC058

Reviews BYD Atto 3

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

VW T-Roc

The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.

details
DB2025AU01832_medium
DB2025AU01833_medium
DB2025AU01840_medium
DB2025AU01844_medium
DB2025AU01835_medium
DB2025AU01866_medium
DB2025AU01834_medium
DB2025AU01852_medium

Reviews VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Ester
17 Sept 2025, 14:29:41

I've been driving the VW T‑Roc for a few months now and I'm totally satisfied. 🚗 The higher seating position gives me a great feeling of security and the visibility in city traffic is excellent. I especially like the modern infotainment system — everything works intuitively and quickly. On the motorway it feels very calm and stable, even at higher speeds. Overall a great car that's a lot of fun and still economical.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …
VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
The VW Golf still sets the benchmark in the compact class — a composed, all‑round hatch that rewards drivers with precise steering, efficient engines and sensible practicality for daily life. The VW T‑Roc trades a bit of that pinch‑perfect poise for SUV style, a higher seating position and a …
BYD Atto 3
BYD Seal U
VS
If you want a friendly, practical EV that looks like it drinks coffee in a hipster cafe and carries everything from groceries to weekend bikes, the BYD Atto 3 is the sensible, value-packed choice. The BYD Seal U, by contrast, dresses up the electric experience with sleeker lines, sharper handling …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca is the sensible, roomy sibling that prioritises practicality and comfort, while the VW T‑Roc plays the cooler, more characterful role with sharper styling and a slightly cheekier drive — both share the VW Group's solid underpinnings and similar engines. Choose the Ateca if you need …
BYD Atto 3
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Meet BYD's feisty duo: the Atto 3 — a cheeky, city-friendly compact crossover — takes on the Sealion 7, a sleeker, more spacious contender that aims to blend family practicality with a touch of flair. Which one wins your garage comes down to whether you crave nimble urban fun or roomy long-range …
BYD Atto 3
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price
33,400 - 43,700 £
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
420 - 510 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,825 kg
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
Trunk capacity
440 L
Trunk capacity
284 L
Length
4,455 mm
Length
-
Width
1,875 mm
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
Height
1,615 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,338 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
335 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 449 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
160 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
310 - 560 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
150 - 330 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
BYD
Brand
VW
Is the BYD Atto 3 offered with different drivetrains?

The BYD Atto 3 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.