Compare performance (136 HP vs 281 HP), boot space and price (31,600 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD ETP3 or Ford Ranger?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
BYD ETP3 is clearly cheaper – starting at 31,600 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,819 £.
As for electric range, the BYD ETP3 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 233 km, about 191 km more than the Ford Ranger.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers substantially more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 145 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers clearly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 180 Nm. That’s about 517 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Ranger offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, BYD ETP3 is significantly lighter – 1,640 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 765 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries clearly more – 989 kg compared to 780 kg. That’s a difference of about 209 kg.
The BYD ETP3 has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BYD ETP3 is a smart, no-nonsense electric offering that blends everyday practicality with a quietly modern design that won’t embarrass you in the supermarket car park. It’s ideal for buyers after fuss-free electric mobility — efficient, clever and just playful enough to make city driving a little more fun.
detailsThe Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
31,600 £
|
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
233 km
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
70 - 265 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
|
Seats
2
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,640 kg
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,460 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,720 mm
|
Width
1,918 mm
|
|
Height
1,875 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
3,500 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
780 kg
|
Payload
845 - 989 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 HP
|
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
100 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
180 Nm
|
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
100 kW
|
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Ford
|