Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BYD Tang vs Skoda Enyaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (517 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (64300 £ vs 38100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Tang or Skoda Enyaq?
Tang
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Enyaq has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38100 £ , while the BYD Tang costs 64300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26228 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s significantly more efficient than the BYD Tang with 24 kWh. That’s a difference of about 9.20 kWh.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs slight better – achieving up to 587 km, about 57 km more than the BYD Tang.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Tang has a noticeable edge – offering 517 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Tang is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the BYD Tang performs slight better – reaching 190 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: BYD Tang pulls barely noticeable stronger with 680 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 1 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Tang
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: BYD Tang offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is distinct lighter – 2002 kg compared to 2630 kg. The difference is around 628 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers decisively more room – 585 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 350 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs slight better – up to 1710 L, which is about 55 L more than the BYD Tang.
When it comes to payload, BYD Tang somewhat takes the win – 575 kg compared to 509 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
BYD Tang
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £38,100
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Tang
The BYD Tang is a bold, tech-loaded SUV that blends striking design with roomy practicality, making it equally at home on the school run and the open road. Packed with clever tech and a powertrain that mixes efficiency with eager performance, it’s a smart, value-focused pick for buyers who want electric-age comfort without the premium-brand fuss.
details
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
BYD Tang
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
64300 £
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
24 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
530 km
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2630 kg
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
235 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4970 mm
|
Length
4658 mm
|
|
Width
1955 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1745 mm
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1655 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
|
Payload
575 kg
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
517 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.90 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
190 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
680 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
380 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Is the BYD Tang offered with different drivetrains?
The BYD Tang is available as All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.