Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BYD Tang vs Skoda Enyaq comparison
Compare performance (517 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (64,300 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Tang or Skoda Enyaq?
BYD Tang vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Video - Skoda Enyaq
Tang
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Enyaq is substantially cheaper – starting at 41,900 £ , while the BYD Tang costs 64,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,371 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is clearly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 24 kWh/100km for the BYD Tang. That’s a difference of about 9.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 57 km more than the BYD Tang.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Tang offers noticeably more power – delivering 517 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Tang is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Tang delivers barely more torque with 680 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 1 Nm more.
Tang
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: BYD Tang offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is noticeably lighter – 2,179 kg compared to 2,630 kg. The difference is around 451 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers substantially more boot space – 585 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 350 L.
When it comes to payload, the BYD Tang carries a bit more – 575 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 86 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £41,900
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Tang
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
BYD Tang
The BYD Tang is a bold, tech-loaded SUV that blends striking design with roomy practicality, making it equally at home on the school run and the open road. Packed with clever tech and a powertrain that mixes efficiency with eager performance, it’s a smart, value-focused pick for buyers who want electric-age comfort without the premium-brand fuss.
details
Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq is a reassuring, family‑first electric SUV that trades sporting drama for exceptional quiet, roomy rear seats and a genuinely practical boot. It’s remarkably easy to live with thanks to sensible controls and steady fast charging, though the touchscreen‑led infotainment can be sluggish and driving enthusiasts looking for sharp handling should look elsewhere.
details
BYD Tang
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
64,300 £
|
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
24 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
530 km
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,630 kg
|
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
235 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,955 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
575 kg
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
517 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
680 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
380 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.