Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Citroen C3 Aircross vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (145 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (16,400 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C3 Aircross or Ford Puma?
Citroen C3 Aircross vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
C3 Aircross
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Citroen C3 Aircross is significantly cheaper – starting at 16,400 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,466 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Citroen C3 Aircross uses 5.3 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is markedly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 16.1 kWh/100km for the Citroen C3 Aircross. That’s a difference of about 3.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 17 km more than the Citroen C3 Aircross.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers a bit more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 145 HP. That’s roughly 23 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Citroen C3 Aircross takes 12.3 s. That’s about 4.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers noticeably more torque with 290 Nm compared to 230 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.
C3 Aircross
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Citroen C3 Aircross is marginally lighter – 1,312 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 4 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers a bit more boot space – 523 L compared to 460 L. That’s a difference of about 63 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries marginally more – 469 kg compared to 462 kg. That’s a difference of about 7 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Citroen C3 Aircross
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Citroen C3 Aircross
The Citroën C3 Aircross is a compact crossover that stands out with its quirky, friendly styling and a tall, airy cabin that prioritizes comfort. It suits buyers who value flexible interior space, good visibility and easy urban driving over sporty performance.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Citroen C3 Aircross
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
16,400 - 29,000 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.1 - 18.1 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
307 - 400 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 134 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,312 - 1,608 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
460 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
407 - 462 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
101 - 145 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 13 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
125 - 230 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
74 - 107 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.