VS

Citroen Jumper vs Ford Puma comparison

Compare performance (279 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (55,100 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Jumper or Ford Puma?

Citroen Jumper vs Ford Puma: Key differences

Citroen Jumper

  • markedly more power
  • only slightly more electric range
details

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Jumper

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Puma is significantly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Citroen Jumper costs 55,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 31,166 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 26.2 kWh/100km for the Citroen Jumper. That’s a difference of about 13.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Citroen Jumper offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 424 km, about 7 km more than the Ford Puma.

Puma

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Citroen Jumper offers markedly more power – delivering 279 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 111 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Citroen Jumper delivers visibly more torque with 410 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is considerably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,865 kg. The difference is around 1,549 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Citroen Jumper carries significantly more – 1,385 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 916 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …
Ford Puma
Skoda Epiq
VS
Ford Puma vs Skoda Epiq is a matchup between a compact, city-oriented crossover and a more conventional Skoda SUV offering (marketed here as the Epiq). This comparison focuses on what matters to real buyers: space, practicality, driving feel, running costs and which car suits which type of …
Citroen Jumper
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Citroen Jumper

The Citroen Jumper is a no-nonsense workhorse that swaps flash for sheer practicality, with a spacious load area and composed, user-friendly driving manners that make busy workdays easier. It won’t win any beauty contests, but its sensible packaging, comfortable cab and wallet-friendly running make it a compelling choice for tradespeople and small businesses.

details
serpimg_arohJY

Reviews Citroen Jumper

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
Kia XCeed
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia XCeed are two of the sharper compact crossovers on the market, each mixing car-like driving manners with useful everyday practicality. This comparison looks at driving dynamics, interior quality, space and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your lifestyle.
Ford Puma
CUPRA Raval
VS
Comparing the Ford Puma and the Cupra Raval pits a practical, compact crossover known for clever packaging and everyday efficiency against a bolder, sport-oriented compact that emphasizes sharper handling, tech and aggressive styling. Your choice comes down to whether you prioritise comfort, …
Citroen Jumper
Fiat Ducato
VS
Choosing between the Citroen Jumper and the Fiat Ducato means choosing between two closely related large vans that share much of their engineering but differ in trim, equipment and dealer support. I’ll focus on the practical differences—cargo space, driving comfort, economy and running costs—so you …
Ford Puma
Opel Astra
VS
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the Vauxhall Astra comes down to whether you want a compact crossover with a sporty, raised stance or a more conventional family hatch with roomy practicality. The Puma brings a higher driving position and clever cargo solutions, while the Astra focuses on space, …
Ford Puma
VW Polo
VS
Comparing the Ford Puma and the VW Polo comes down to choosing between a compact crossover that brings extra practicality and a semi-sporty feel (the Puma) and a traditional supermini that prioritizes refinement, build quality and precise handling (the VW Polo). Both are excellent everyday cars — …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Bayon
VS
Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon are compact crossover rivals that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling and efficient engines. This quick comparison highlights how they differ in driving feel, cabin practicality, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily needs.
Citroen Jumper
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
Price
55,100 - 57,800 £
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
26.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
424 km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
3
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,865 - 2,940 kg
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,050 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
560 - 1,385 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
279 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
410 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
205 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Ford
What drivetrain options does the Citroen Jumper have?

The Citroen Jumper is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.