VS

CUPRA Terramar vs Audi Q4 e-tron comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (42,000 £ vs 40,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Terramar or Audi Q4 e-tron?

CUPRA Terramar vs Audi Q4 e-tron: Key differences

CUPRA Terramar

4.9 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
details

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Terramar

Comparative Analysis: Audi Q4 e-tron vs CUPRA Terramar

As the automotive market continues to evolve, electric and hybrid vehicles are becoming the new norm. Two notable contenders in the SUV segment are the Audi Q4 e-tron and the CUPRA Terramar. Both vehicles are designed to meet the consumers' diverse demands for performance, efficiency, and technology. In this article, we’ll plunge into a side-by-side comparison of these two innovative models, examining their technical aspects and innovative features.

Q4 e-tron

Powertrain and Performance

The Audi Q4 e-tron is available in various configurations, with power outputs ranging from 170 HP to an impressive 340 HP. It utilizes a purely electric powertrain with options for rear-wheel and all-wheel drive, allowing for dynamic handling and acceleration. In terms of performance, the Q4 e-tron boasts an acceleration of 0-100 km/h in as quick as 5.4 seconds, showcasing its sporty edge.

On the other hand, the CUPRA Terramar offers a range of powertrain options, including plug-in hybrid, petrol MHEV, and petrol versions, generating up to 272 HP. It accelerates from 0-100 km/h in as little as 5.3 seconds when equipped with the right configuration, proving that it is not to be underestimated in terms of speed and agility.

Terramar

Efficiency and Range

Efficiency is key for modern SUVs, and the Q4 e-tron shines with an electrical consumption range between 15.9 to 17.4 kWh/100 km. With an electric range of up to 554 km, it poses an excellent option for those looking to reduce their carbon footprint without compromising on travel distance.

The CUPRA Terramar, with its petrol engines, offers fuel consumption figures ranging from 0.4 to 8.5 L/100 km depending on the engine type. Its plug-in hybrid variant provides an electric range of up to 120 km, which can be particularly advantageous for short commutes or urban driving, where electric-only operation can minimize fuel consumption.

Q4 e-tron

Interior Comfort and Technology

Both vehicles provide a well-appointed interior with room for five passengers. The Audi Q4 e-tron stands out with its trunk capacity of up to 535 liters, providing ample space for cargo. The cockpit brims with modern technology, featuring a digital dashboard and advanced infotainment systems that integrate seamlessly with smartphones.

Meanwhile, the CUPRA Terramar emphasizes a sportier look, reflecting the brand’s performance-oriented ethos. The cabin incorporates contemporary design elements while still ensuring comfort and usability. Its trunk space offers up to 540 liters, slightly outperforming the Q4 in terms of utility.

Terramar

Safety and Driver Assistance Features

Safety is paramount in any modern vehicle, and both the Q4 e-tron and Terramar come equipped with a suite of advanced driver assistance systems. Audi’s reputation for safety is evident in the Q4 e-tron with features such as adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and a robust suite of airbags.

CUPRA is also making large strides in this department, incorporating features like adaptive cruise control, a 360-degree camera system, and advanced collision warning systems that enhance driver confidence on the road.

Q4 e-tron

Conclusion: Choosing Between Innovation and Performance

The decision between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the CUPRA Terramar ultimately hinges on consumer priorities. If a cutting-edge electric SUV with a longer range is the goal, the Q4 e-tron proves to be exemplary. Conversely, for those focused on hybrid versatility and spirited driving experiences, the Terramar is an attractive candidate.

In the rapidly evolving automotive landscape, both models represent their brands’ commitment to innovation, sustainability, and driving pleasure. As the future progresses, these vehicles will likely continue to influence the trajectory of SUV designs on the roads.

Frequently compared as well

CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
Choosing between the Cupra Formentor and the Cupra Terramar means deciding whether you want a sporting, head-turning compact crossover or a more conventional compact SUV that leans toward comfort and space. The Formentor emphasizes sharper handling, bold styling and a driver-focused feel, while the …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Terramar

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Audi Q4 e-tron is only slightly cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the CUPRA Terramar costs 42,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,268 £.

As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers clearly more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 474 km more than the CUPRA Terramar.

Q4 e-tron

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers moderately more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the CUPRA Terramar takes 5.9 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers clearly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 279 Nm more.

Terramar

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, CUPRA Terramar is visibly lighter – 1,638 kg compared to 2,035 kg. The difference is around 397 kg.

Looking at boot space, the CUPRA Terramar offers marginally more boot space – 540 L compared to 535 L. That’s a difference of about 5 L.

When it comes to payload, the CUPRA Terramar carries marginally more – 542 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 27 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,700
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 440 - 592 km
details
CUPRA Terramar
Audi Q4 e-tron

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

CUPRA Terramar

The CUPRA Terramar blends the brand’s sporty DNA with the practicality of a compact crossover, offering striking design and a driver-focused, premium-feeling cabin. It’s aimed at buyers who want engaging handling and athletic looks without giving up everyday usability and modern connectivity.

details
IMG_0231
CUPRA-unveils-the-Terramar-the-new-hero-of-a-new-era_07_HQ
CUPRA-unveils-the-Terramar-the-new-hero-of-a-new-era_13_HQ

Reviews CUPRA Terramar

4.9 (8 Reviews)
rate
Marcin
4 Jun 2026, 13:13:44

My impressions are based on only a three-day test drive, and they are excellent. The test drive "convinced" me to buy the Cupra Terramar, and I am currently waiting for the model I ordered.

Lawrence
27 May 2026, 23:26:12

Test drove both, Terramar is more liveable for a family as more practical with larger interior space and feels more premium overall. The Formentor in VZ form is super fast and agile and great fun to drive, but feels less premium all round. I also think the Terramar looks nicer inside and out.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
David Burrell
21 Jan 2026, 22:24:34

Had a Terramar for nearly 12 months and it’s proven a great choice. Love the driving experience and that fact it’s less common than Tiguan/Q3 cousins. V2 spec gives you so much kit you don’t need any extras.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafał
13 Jan 2026, 21:59:07

A better-equipped version of a car that's technically very similar to the Q3, offered at a more attractive price.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details
A213272_overfull
A213273_overfull
A213248_overfull
A213261_overfull
A213263_overfull
A213264_overfull

Reviews Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Alain
10 Jun 2026, 00:16:47

A more attractive vehicle inside and out, with German reliability.

Frequently compared as well

CUPRA Tavascan
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Cupra Tavascan is Cupra’s all-electric crossover, offering sleek styling and EV-focused tech, while the Cupra Terramar targets buyers who prefer a compact, performance-oriented SUV with a conventional powertrain. This comparison cuts through driving character, practicality, equipment and …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX1 are compact electric SUVs that aim to balance everyday practicality with distinct brand characters — the Q4 e-tron leans toward refined comfort and a premium cabin, while the iX1 emphasizes sporty handling and tech-forward features. This comparison will walk you …
CUPRA Terramar
Hyundai Tucson
VS
CUPRA Terramar dials up the drama with razor-sharp handling, punchy powertrains and a design that shouts performance — it's the hot-hatch of the SUV world for drivers who actually enjoy twisty roads. The Hyundai Tucson, by contrast, is a sensible all‑rounder: spacious, comfortable and economical, …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Kia EV3
VS
This comparison puts the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Kia EV3 head-to-head, contrasting Audi’s premium, tech-rich compact electric SUV with Kia’s practical, value-driven EV. Read on to see how they match up on range, comfort, features and running costs so you can choose the right electric car for your …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value Audi’s premium feel and refined driving experience or Skoda’s clever packaging and better value. The Q4 e-tron focuses on high-quality materials, tech and a composed ride, while the Elroq prioritises interior …
CUPRA Terramar
SEAT Ateca
VS
The CUPRA Terramar serves up sharp handling, punchy powertrains and a premium, slightly flashy cabin that feels like the hot hatch’s grown-up, wearing an SUV’s clothes. The SEAT Ateca is the sensible alternative — roomier, cheaper to run and refreshingly unpretentious — perfect for buyers who want …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX3
VS
The Audi Q4 e‑tron feels like the sensible, tech‑savvy choice — airy cabin, clever packaging and a polished, Scandinavian calm that suits family life and long commutes. The BMW iX3, by contrast, plays the sporty, driver‑centric card with taut handling and BMW polish, so pick the Q4 for everyday …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
CUPRA Terramar
Audi Q4 e-tron

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,000 - 51,100 £
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 8.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
118 km
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
36 - 191 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,638 - 1,904 kg
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Trunk capacity
450 - 540 L
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,869 mm
Width
1,865 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
512 - 542 kg
Payload
505 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
CUPRA
Brand
Audi
Is the CUPRA Terramar offered with different drivetrains?

The CUPRA Terramar is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.