VS

CUPRA Terramar vs Ford Puma comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (41,400 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Terramar or Ford Puma?

CUPRA Terramar vs Ford Puma: Key differences

CUPRA Terramar

5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • substantially more electric range
  • noticeably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Terramar

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Puma is significantly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the CUPRA Terramar costs 41,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,503 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the CUPRA Terramar uses 1.6 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.8 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers substantially more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 299 km more than the CUPRA Terramar.

Puma

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the CUPRA Terramar offers visibly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 104 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the CUPRA Terramar is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the CUPRA Terramar delivers visibly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm more.

Terramar

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is noticeably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,638 kg. The difference is around 322 kg.

When it comes to payload, the CUPRA Terramar carries a bit more – 542 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 73 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The CUPRA Terramar is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,400
Terramar

CUPRA Terramar

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 8.4 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 118 km
details

Frequently compared as well

CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
Choosing between the Cupra Formentor and the Cupra Terramar means deciding whether you want a sporting, head-turning compact crossover or a more conventional compact SUV that leans toward comfort and space. The Formentor emphasizes sharper handling, bold styling and a driver-focused feel, while the …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
CUPRA Terramar
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

CUPRA Terramar

The CUPRA Terramar blends the brand’s sporty DNA with the practicality of a compact crossover, offering striking design and a driver-focused, premium-feeling cabin. It’s aimed at buyers who want engaging handling and athletic looks without giving up everyday usability and modern connectivity.

details
IMG_0231
CUPRA-unveils-the-Terramar-the-new-hero-of-a-new-era_07_HQ
CUPRA-unveils-the-Terramar-the-new-hero-of-a-new-era_13_HQ

Reviews CUPRA Terramar

5 (5 Reviews)
rate
David Burrell
21 Jan 2026, 22:24:34

Had a Terramar for nearly 12 months and it’s proven a great choice. Love the driving experience and that fact it’s less common than Tiguan/Q3 cousins. V2 spec gives you so much kit you don’t need any extras.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafał
13 Jan 2026, 21:59:07

A better-equipped version of a car that's technically very similar to the Q3, offered at a more attractive price.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

CUPRA Tavascan
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Cupra Tavascan is Cupra’s all-electric crossover, offering sleek styling and EV-focused tech, while the Cupra Terramar targets buyers who prefer a compact, performance-oriented SUV with a conventional powertrain. This comparison cuts through driving character, practicality, equipment and …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
CUPRA Terramar
SEAT Ateca
VS
The CUPRA Terramar serves up sharp handling, punchy powertrains and a premium, slightly flashy cabin that feels like the hot hatch’s grown-up, wearing an SUV’s clothes. The SEAT Ateca is the sensible alternative — roomier, cheaper to run and refreshingly unpretentious — perfect for buyers who want …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
CUPRA Terramar
Hyundai Tucson
VS
CUPRA Terramar dials up the drama with razor-sharp handling, punchy powertrains and a design that shouts performance — it's the hot-hatch of the SUV world for drivers who actually enjoy twisty roads. The Hyundai Tucson, by contrast, is a sensible all‑rounder: spacious, comfortable and economical, …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona are two of the most popular compact crossovers, combining practical interiors, elevated driving positions and city-friendly footprints. Choosing between the Puma’s engaging handling and efficient mild-hybrid options and the Kona’s broader engine range and tech-rich …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Bayon
VS
Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon are compact crossover rivals that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling and efficient engines. This quick comparison highlights how they differ in driving feel, cabin practicality, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily needs.
CUPRA Terramar
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
Price
41,400 - 50,600 £
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 8.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
118 km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
36 - 191 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,638 - 1,904 kg
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Trunk capacity
450 - 540 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,869 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
512 - 542 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
Brand
CUPRA
Brand
Ford
Is the CUPRA Terramar offered with different drivetrains?

The CUPRA Terramar is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.