Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Terramar or Volvo XC60?
As the automotive market continuously evolves, two standout contenders in the SUV segment are the CUPRA Terramar and the Volvo XC60. Both models boast impressive specifications, innovative technologies, and a commitment to performance and safety. This comparison aims to shed light on the differences and similarities between these two SUVs, focusing on technical aspects, innovations, and overall driving experience.
The CUPRA Terramar measures 4519 mm in length, 1869 mm in width, and stands 1586 mm tall, showcasing a bold and athletic exterior. In contrast, the Volvo XC60 is slightly larger, with dimensions of 4688 mm in length, 1902 mm in width, and 1658 mm in height. This larger footprint of the XC60 contributes to a more spacious interior, making it a favorable option for families or those needing extra cargo space.
CUPRA offers the Terramar with a variety of powertrains, including petrol options and a plug-in hybrid variant. The most powerful engine produces a staggering 272 HP and 400 Nm of torque, allowing for thrilling acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in just 5.3 seconds. Meanwhile, the XC60 features several engine choices, with the hybrid variant reaching 455 HP and a remarkable torque of 709 Nm, translating to a swift acceleration of 4.9 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h.
Fuel efficiency also varies, with the Terramar's plug-in hybrid consuming as little as 0.4 L/100km and boasting an electric range of 120 km thanks to its 19.7 kWh battery. The Volvo XC60, while slightly less efficient, offers an electric range of up to 80 km with a 14.7 kWh battery, giving drivers the option of electric-only short trips.
Both the CUPRA Terramar and the Volvo XC60 feature all-wheel-drive systems, enhancing stability and handling in diverse driving conditions. The Terramar provides a sportier driving experience, attributed to its lower curb weight and better power-to-weight ratio. In comparison, the XC60 excels in comfort, providing a smooth ride characteristic of Volvo’s approach to luxury SUVs.
Inside, both vehicles can comfortably seat five passengers, but the XC60 offers a more premium feel with high-quality materials and a focus on driver and passenger comfort. The Terramar, on the other hand, leans into its sporty character, blending functionality with a tech-savvy interface.
Innovative technology plays a vital role in both models. The CUPRA Terramar is equipped with advanced infotainment systems and driver assistance features that enhance safety and connectivity. Similarly, the XC60 boasts cutting-edge safety innovations, highlighted by a robust suite of standard and optional safety features, including Volvo's renowned Pilot Assist technology.
In summary, the CUPRA Terramar and Volvo XC60 cater to different yet overlapping markets. The Terramar appeals to those looking for a sporty, performance-driven SUV, while the XC60 is tailored for drivers who prioritize comfort and safety. Ultimately, the choice between these two SUVs will depend on individual preferences regarding performance, design, and technological benefits.
Whether you favor the exhilarating experience behind the wheel of the CUPRA Terramar or the refined luxury of the Volvo XC60, both SUVs represent impressive feats of engineering and design, paving the way for the future of the automotive landscape.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
CUPRA Terramar has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36900 £, while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £. That’s a price difference of around 12317 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo XC60 manages with 2.80 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the CUPRA Terramar with 6.10 L. The difference is about 3.30 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a significantly edge – offering 455 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 190 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the CUPRA Terramar takes 5.90 s. That’s about 1 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the CUPRA Terramar performs noticeable better – reaching 243 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 63 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls clearly stronger with 709 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 309 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, CUPRA Terramar is somewhat lighter – 1638 kg compared to 1900 kg. The difference is around 262 kg.
In terms of boot space, the CUPRA Terramar offers a bit more room – 540 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 57 L.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC60 slight takes the win – 550 kg compared to 542 kg. That’s a difference of about 8 kg.
Overall, the Volvo XC60 shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
@ Volvo Cars
The CUPRA Terramar is a sharply styled, sporty SUV that brings athletic handling and bold design to buyers who want performance with everyday usability. Inside, premium finishes meet driver-focused flair and family-friendly practicality, making it a tempting pick for anyone who wants thrills without turning their daily routine into a chore.
details
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.
details
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
|
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
|
@ Volvo Cars
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36900 - 48500 £
|
Price
49200 - 75100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.1 - 8.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
139 - 191 g/km
|
co2
64 - 169 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 60 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1638 - 1750 kg
|
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
540 L
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
|
|
Length
4519 mm
|
Length
4708 mm
|
|
Width
1869 mm
|
Width
1902 mm
|
|
Height
1586 mm
|
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
|
|
Payload
540 - 542 kg
|
Payload
510 - 550 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
205 - 243 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
|
Brand
CUPRA
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The CUPRA Terramar is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España