Compare performance (272 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (42,000 £ vs 58,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Terramar or Volvo XC60?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
As the automotive market continuously evolves, two standout contenders in the SUV segment are the CUPRA Terramar and the Volvo XC60. Both models boast impressive specifications, innovative technologies, and a commitment to performance and safety. This comparison aims to shed light on the differences and similarities between these two SUVs, focusing on technical aspects, innovations, and overall driving experience.
The CUPRA Terramar measures 4519 mm in length, 1869 mm in width, and stands 1586 mm tall, showcasing a bold and athletic exterior. In contrast, the Volvo XC60 is slightly larger, with dimensions of 4688 mm in length, 1902 mm in width, and 1658 mm in height. This larger footprint of the XC60 contributes to a more spacious interior, making it a favorable option for families or those needing extra cargo space.
CUPRA offers the Terramar with a variety of powertrains, including petrol options and a plug-in hybrid variant. The most powerful engine produces a staggering 272 HP and 400 Nm of torque, allowing for thrilling acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in just 5.3 seconds. Meanwhile, the XC60 features several engine choices, with the hybrid variant reaching 455 HP and a remarkable torque of 709 Nm, translating to a swift acceleration of 4.9 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h.
Fuel efficiency also varies, with the Terramar's plug-in hybrid consuming as little as 0.4 L/100km and boasting an electric range of 120 km thanks to its 19.7 kWh battery. The Volvo XC60, while slightly less efficient, offers an electric range of up to 80 km with a 14.7 kWh battery, giving drivers the option of electric-only short trips.
Both the CUPRA Terramar and the Volvo XC60 feature all-wheel-drive systems, enhancing stability and handling in diverse driving conditions. The Terramar provides a sportier driving experience, attributed to its lower curb weight and better power-to-weight ratio. In comparison, the XC60 excels in comfort, providing a smooth ride characteristic of Volvo’s approach to luxury SUVs.
Inside, both vehicles can comfortably seat five passengers, but the XC60 offers a more premium feel with high-quality materials and a focus on driver and passenger comfort. The Terramar, on the other hand, leans into its sporty character, blending functionality with a tech-savvy interface.
Innovative technology plays a vital role in both models. The CUPRA Terramar is equipped with advanced infotainment systems and driver assistance features that enhance safety and connectivity. Similarly, the XC60 boasts cutting-edge safety innovations, highlighted by a robust suite of standard and optional safety features, including Volvo's renowned Pilot Assist technology.
In summary, the CUPRA Terramar and Volvo XC60 cater to different yet overlapping markets. The Terramar appeals to those looking for a sporty, performance-driven SUV, while the XC60 is tailored for drivers who prioritize comfort and safety. Ultimately, the choice between these two SUVs will depend on individual preferences regarding performance, design, and technological benefits.
Whether you favor the exhilarating experience behind the wheel of the CUPRA Terramar or the refined luxury of the Volvo XC60, both SUVs represent impressive feats of engineering and design, paving the way for the future of the automotive landscape.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
CUPRA Terramar is markedly cheaper – starting at 42,000 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 58,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,295 £.
Both cars consume an average of 1.6 L/100km – no difference here.
As for electric range, the CUPRA Terramar offers clearly more range – reaching up to 118 km, about 39 km more than the Volvo XC60.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers visibly more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 134 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the CUPRA Terramar takes 5.9 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers substantially more torque with 669 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 269 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, CUPRA Terramar is noticeably lighter – 1,638 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 512 kg.
When it comes to payload, the CUPRA Terramar carries marginally more – 542 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 32 kg.
The CUPRA Terramar stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The CUPRA Terramar blends the brand’s sporty DNA with the practicality of a compact crossover, offering striking design and a driver-focused, premium-feeling cabin. It’s aimed at buyers who want engaging handling and athletic looks without giving up everyday usability and modern connectivity.
details
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
42,000 - 51,100 £
|
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 8.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
118 km
|
Electric Range
79 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
36 - 191 g/km
|
co2
59 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,638 - 1,904 kg
|
Curb weight
2,150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
450 - 540 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,869 mm
|
Width
1,902 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
512 - 542 kg
|
Payload
510 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
CUPRA
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España