Compare performance (102 HP vs 281 HP), boot space and price (14,500 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Dacia Spring or Ford Ranger?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Dacia Spring is substantially cheaper – starting at 14,500 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 33,954 £.
As for electric range, the Dacia Spring offers substantially more range – reaching up to 225 km, about 183 km more than the Ford Ranger.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers significantly more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 102 HP. That’s roughly 179 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Ranger is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Dacia Spring takes 9.6 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers significantly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 137 Nm. That’s about 560 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Ranger offers more seats – 5 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, Dacia Spring is considerably lighter – 1,070 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 1,335 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries substantially more – 989 kg compared to 274 kg. That’s a difference of about 715 kg.
The Dacia Spring holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Dacia Spring is an unpretentious city electric that strips EV ownership down to the essentials, offering clean, fuss-free transport for daily urban life. It won't impress luxury-seekers, but its cheerful practicality and rock-bottom running costs make it a clever, no-nonsense choice for anyone who wants electric mobility without the drama.
detailsThe Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
14,500 - 16,900 £
|
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
12.4 - 12.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
221 - 225 km
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
70 - 265 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,070 kg
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
308 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,583 mm
|
Width
1,918 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
274 kg
|
Payload
845 - 989 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
70 - 102 HP
|
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.6 - 12.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
137 Nm
|
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
52 - 75 kW
|
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Dacia
|
Brand
Ford
|