VS

Dacia Spring vs Mazda CX-30 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (65 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (14500 £ vs 25200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Dacia Spring or Mazda CX-30?

Dacia Spring

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

You can find all user reviews further down on this page.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Spring

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Dacia Spring has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 14500 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10749 £.

CX-30

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a decisively edge – offering 186 HP compared to 65 HP. That’s roughly 121 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Dacia Spring takes 13.70 s. That’s about 5.40 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-30 pulls clearly stronger with 240 Nm compared to 125 Nm. That’s about 115 Nm difference.

Ad · Affiliate
Car accessories
Car accessories
Popular best-sellers for everyday use & care
View on Amazon →
Boot organiser
Boot organiser
Storage boxes, nets & anti-slip solutions
Open best-sellers →
Car dash cams
Car dash cams
Safety, parking mode & 4K recording
See top models →
Car phone holders
Car phone holders
MagSafe, vent mounts & dashboard mounts
Browse popular mounts →
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Spring

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-30 offers a bit more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.

In curb weight, Dacia Spring is clearly lighter – 1013 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 442 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers distinct more room – 430 L compared to 308 L. That’s a difference of about 122 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 noticeable takes the win – 496 kg compared to 302 kg. That’s a difference of about 194 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Dacia Spring
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £25,200
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L
details

Dacia Spring

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Dacia Spring is an unpretentious city electric that strips EV ownership down to the essentials, offering clean, fuss-free transport for daily urban life. It won't impress luxury-seekers, but its cheerful practicality and rock-bottom running costs make it a clever, no-nonsense choice for anyone who wants electric mobility without the drama.

details
d220192p
d220193p
d220194p

Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Dacia Spring

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
Cristian
12 Jan 2026, 12:27:33

Best car for value

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Reviews Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
Dacia Spring
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
14500 - 17100 £
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.2 - 14.1 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
225 - 228 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
26.80 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1013 - 1050 kg
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity
308 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
3701 mm
Length
-
Width
1583 mm
Width
1795 mm
Height
1519 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1004 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
265 - 302 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
44 - 65 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.7 - 19.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
125 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
113 - 125 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
33 - 48 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Dacia
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and the VW T-Roc both bring distinct flavors to the table. The Mazda CX-30 is celebrated for its elegant design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a luxurious feel with its high-quality interior and impressive handling. Meanwhile, the …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
Dacia Spring
Hyundai Inster
VS
In the growing electric vehicle market, the Dacia Spring stands out for its affordability and practicality, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Hyundai Ioniq impresses with its advanced technology, superior range, and dynamic driving experience, catering to …
Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson emerges as a versatile contender, boasting a spacious interior and cutting-edge technology features. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 captivates drivers with its engaging driving dynamics and premium interior aesthetics, making it a standout for …
Audi Q2
Mazda CX-30
VS
Unsure whether the Audi Q2 or the Mazda CX-30 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, …
Mazda CX-30
Renault Captur
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Mazda CX-30 showcases a premium interior and sporty driving dynamics that set it apart from the Renault Captur, which excels in practicality and customizable design. While the CX-30 appeals to those seeking a more engaging experience behind the wheel, the …
What drive types are available for the Dacia Spring?

The Dacia Spring is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.