Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-30 vs Renault Captur - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (186 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (25200 £ vs 21100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Renault Captur?
CX-30
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Captur has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21100 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4106 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Captur manages with 4.40 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 1.30 L per 100 km.
Captur
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a to a small extent edge – offering 186 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Renault Captur takes 8.90 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Captur pulls slight stronger with 265 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
CX-30
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Renault Captur is barely noticeable lighter – 1323 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 132 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers slight more room – 430 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 8 L.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 minimal takes the win – 496 kg compared to 453 kg. That’s a difference of about 43 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Renault Captur shows small but noticeable advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mazda CX-30
Renault Captur
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £21,100
Renault Captur
Mazda CX-30
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.
details
Renault Captur
5 (3 Reviews)
The Renault Captur is a cheeky little crossover that pairs city-friendly agility with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and enough style to turn heads at the lights. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want practical versatility and a dash of personality on their daily drives, without taking itself too seriously.
details
Mazda CX-30
Renault Captur
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25200 - 36800 £
|
Price
21100 - 28400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
|
Curb weight
1323 - 1441 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4239 mm
|
|
Width
1795 mm
|
Width
1797 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1575 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1363 L
|
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Payload
447 - 453 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Renault
|
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?
The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.