Compare performance (186 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Renault Captur?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving landscape of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and Renault Captur stand out as strong contenders. Both vehicles offer unique blends of aesthetics, technology, and performance but cater to different driving philosophies. This article delves into the technical aspects and innovative features of both models to help prospective buyers make an informed choice.
The Mazda CX-30 boasts a robust engine lineup, featuring a petrol MHEV with options ranging from 140 HP to 186 HP. With a choice between manual and automatic transmissions, the CX-30 caters to diverse driver preferences. Its acceleration times are impressive, clocking in as low as 8.3 seconds for the 0-100 km/h sprint, thanks to its powerful 2.0-liter engine. The all-wheel-drive variant offers enhanced handling and stability, particularly in adverse weather conditions.
On the other hand, the Renault Captur offers a well-rounded powertrain lineup that includes a full hybrid, petrol MHEV, LPG, and standard petrol options. The Captur's maximum output reaches 158 HP. Its acceleration, while a touch slower than the CX-30, still competes well within its segment, achieving the 0-100 km/h mark in as little as 8.5 seconds. The front-wheel-drive setup ensures a smooth driving experience, although it might slightly lag behind the CX-30 in more challenging terrains.
Fuel efficiency is a noteworthy aspect of the Mazda CX-30, with consumption figures ranging between 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km. The vehicle also boasts a CO2 emissions rating that varies from 129 to 148 g/km, placing it within the D and E efficiency classes. The combination of performance and relatively low consumption makes it an appealing option for environmentally-conscious drivers.
Conversely, the Renault Captur shines in fuel efficiency, particularly with its hybrid variants. It records consumption figures as low as 4.7 L/100 km, showcasing its commitment to sustainability. With CO2 emissions ratings ranging from 106 to 139 g/km, the Captur holds an edge in terms of greener credentials, typical of Renault's innovative engineering philosophy.
Inside, the Mazda CX-30 is celebrated for its driver-centric layout and premium materials, giving off a more upscale vibe. The infotainment system is intuitive, featuring a centrally positioned screen that integrates seamlessly with smartphone connectivity options. The spacious trunk capacity of 430 liters provides practical storage for day-to-day usage.
The Renault Captur, while also spacious, takes a slightly different approach with a focus on customizable interior elements. The technology packed into the Captur is impressive, with an energetic infotainment system that supports multiple connectivity options. The trunk space matches that of the CX-30 at 422 liters, making it practical for family outings and everyday tasks.
Safety is a priority for both vehicles, with the Mazda CX-30 equipped with an array of advanced safety features, including adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assistance, and automatic emergency braking. These features contribute to a higher safety rating that gives drivers peace of mind on the road.
Similarly, the Renault Captur doesn't fall short in the safety department. It incorporates a suite of safety technologies, including automatic emergency braking, lane departure warnings, and other driver assistance systems, ensuring a secure driving experience for occupants.
Ultimately, the choice between the Mazda CX-30 and the Renault Captur boils down to personal preferences. If you prioritize performance and an upscale interior, the CX-30 is an excellent option. However, if eco-friendliness, fuel efficiency, and customizable interiors are at the forefront of your automotive desires, the Captur caters beautifully to those specific needs.
Both vehicles encapsulate the essence of modern SUVs, offering a blend of style, functionality, and innovation, ensuring that whichever model you choose, you'll be driving a truly impressive machine.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Renault Captur is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,320 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Captur uses 4.4 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers somewhat more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Renault Captur takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Captur delivers only slightly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Captur is very slightly lighter – 1,323 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 132 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers marginally more boot space – 430 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 8 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries very slightly more – 496 kg compared to 453 kg. That’s a difference of about 43 kg.
The Renault Captur is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.
details
The Renault Captur is a stylish and practical compact crossover that combines a high seating position and easy manoeuvrability with a comfortable, well‑equipped cabin. Its flexible interior layout and modern infotainment make it a sensible, polished choice for city drivers and small families.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
|
Price
21,400 - 28,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
|
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Payload
447 - 453 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Renault
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España