In the battle of compact crossovers, the Mazda CX-30 showcases a premium interior and sporty driving dynamics that set it apart from the Renault Captur, which excels in practicality and customizable design. While the CX-30 appeals to those seeking a more engaging experience behind the wheel, the Captur offers versatility with its ample cargo space and user-friendly technology. Ultimately, your choice between these two vehicles will depend on whether you prioritize performance or everyday functionality.
In the ever-evolving landscape of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and Renault Captur stand out as strong contenders. Both vehicles offer unique blends of aesthetics, technology, and performance but cater to different driving philosophies. This article delves into the technical aspects and innovative features of both models to help prospective buyers make an informed choice.
The Mazda CX-30 boasts a robust engine lineup, featuring a petrol MHEV with options ranging from 140 HP to 186 HP. With a choice between manual and automatic transmissions, the CX-30 caters to diverse driver preferences. Its acceleration times are impressive, clocking in as low as 8.3 seconds for the 0-100 km/h sprint, thanks to its powerful 2.0-liter engine. The all-wheel-drive variant offers enhanced handling and stability, particularly in adverse weather conditions.
On the other hand, the Renault Captur offers a well-rounded powertrain lineup that includes a full hybrid, petrol MHEV, LPG, and standard petrol options. The Captur's maximum output reaches 158 HP. Its acceleration, while a touch slower than the CX-30, still competes well within its segment, achieving the 0-100 km/h mark in as little as 8.5 seconds. The front-wheel-drive setup ensures a smooth driving experience, although it might slightly lag behind the CX-30 in more challenging terrains.
Fuel efficiency is a noteworthy aspect of the Mazda CX-30, with consumption figures ranging between 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km. The vehicle also boasts a CO2 emissions rating that varies from 129 to 148 g/km, placing it within the D and E efficiency classes. The combination of performance and relatively low consumption makes it an appealing option for environmentally-conscious drivers.
Conversely, the Renault Captur shines in fuel efficiency, particularly with its hybrid variants. It records consumption figures as low as 4.7 L/100 km, showcasing its commitment to sustainability. With CO2 emissions ratings ranging from 106 to 139 g/km, the Captur holds an edge in terms of greener credentials, typical of Renault's innovative engineering philosophy.
Inside, the Mazda CX-30 is celebrated for its driver-centric layout and premium materials, giving off a more upscale vibe. The infotainment system is intuitive, featuring a centrally positioned screen that integrates seamlessly with smartphone connectivity options. The spacious trunk capacity of 430 liters provides practical storage for day-to-day usage.
The Renault Captur, while also spacious, takes a slightly different approach with a focus on customizable interior elements. The technology packed into the Captur is impressive, with an energetic infotainment system that supports multiple connectivity options. The trunk space matches that of the CX-30 at 422 liters, making it practical for family outings and everyday tasks.
Safety is a priority for both vehicles, with the Mazda CX-30 equipped with an array of advanced safety features, including adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assistance, and automatic emergency braking. These features contribute to a higher safety rating that gives drivers peace of mind on the road.
Similarly, the Renault Captur doesn't fall short in the safety department. It incorporates a suite of safety technologies, including automatic emergency braking, lane departure warnings, and other driver assistance systems, ensuring a secure driving experience for occupants.
Ultimately, the choice between the Mazda CX-30 and the Renault Captur boils down to personal preferences. If you prioritize performance and an upscale interior, the CX-30 is an excellent option. However, if eco-friendliness, fuel efficiency, and customizable interiors are at the forefront of your automotive desires, the Captur caters beautifully to those specific needs.
Both vehicles encapsulate the essence of modern SUVs, offering a blend of style, functionality, and innovation, ensuring that whichever model you choose, you'll be driving a truly impressive machine.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 24800 - 36300
£
|
Price
about 19700 - 28100
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 7.8
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
0.6
kWh
|
co2
129 - 148
g/km
|
co2
106 - 139
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 - 48
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1455 - 1587
kg
|
Curb weight
1358 - 1522
kg
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430
L
|
Trunk capacity
326 - 422
L
|
Length
4395
mm
|
Length
4239
mm
|
Width
1795
mm
|
Width
1797
mm
|
Height
1540
mm
|
Height
1575
mm
|
Payload
458 - 496
kg
|
Payload
372 - 383
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, LPG, Petrol
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
140 - 186
HP
|
Power HP
91 - 158
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 14.3
s
|
Max Speed
191 - 204
km/h
|
Max Speed
168 - 180
km/h
|
Torque
238 - 240
Nm
|
Torque
160 - 270
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
103 - 137
kW
|
Power kW
67 - 116
kW
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1598
cm3
|
Top speed
191 - 204
km/h
|
Top speed
168 - 180
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Renault
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.