VS

Dacia Spring vs Volvo EX30 comparison

Compare performance (100 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (14,500 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Dacia Spring or Volvo EX30?

Dacia Spring vs Volvo EX30: Key differences

Dacia Spring

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • markedly more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

Volvo EX30

3.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Spring

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Dacia Spring is significantly cheaper – starting at 14,500 £ , while the Volvo EX30 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,506 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Dacia Spring is markedly more efficient: consuming 12.4 kWh/100km compared to 17 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX30. That’s a difference of about 4.6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX30 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 475 km, about 250 km more than the Dacia Spring.

EX30

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX30 offers substantially more power – delivering 428 HP compared to 100 HP. That’s roughly 328 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX30 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Dacia Spring takes 9.6 s. That’s about 6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX30 delivers substantially more torque with 543 Nm compared to 137 Nm. That’s about 406 Nm more.

Spring

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Volvo EX30 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Dacia Spring is considerably lighter – 1,070 kg compared to 1,840 kg. The difference is around 770 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX30 carries noticeably more – 390 kg compared to 274 kg. That’s a difference of about 116 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX30 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,000
EX30

Volvo EX30

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 428 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 339 - 475 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX30
Volvo EX60
VS
The Volvo EX30 and EX60 represent two different takes on Volvo’s electric SUV lineup: the EX30 is a compact, city-focused, entry-level EV while the EX60 is a larger, mid-size option that emphasizes space, range and family comfort. This comparison cuts through specs and real-world strengths so you …
Dacia Spring
Renault Twingo
VS
Small, affordable and built for city life, the Dacia Spring and Renault Twingo offer two different takes on electric urban transport. This comparison cuts through the specs to show how they differ in range, interior space, driving character and ownership costs so you can choose the better fit.
Dacia Spring
Volvo EX30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Dacia Spring

The Dacia Spring is an unpretentious city electric that strips EV ownership down to the essentials, offering clean, fuss-free transport for daily urban life. It won't impress luxury-seekers, but its cheerful practicality and rock-bottom running costs make it a clever, no-nonsense choice for anyone who wants electric mobility without the drama.

details
d220192p
d220193p
d220194p

Reviews Dacia Spring

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Cristian
12 Jan 2026, 12:27:33

Best car for value

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo EX30

The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact electric with crisp Scandinavian design and a cheeky personality, proving you can be serious about safety and still enjoy a grin on your commute. Its cabin is cleverly packaged and delightfully easy to live with, offering smart tech and practical touches that make it feel like a grown-up's city car with a sense of fun.

details
313302_Volvo_EX30
313320_Volvo_EX30
313329_Volvo_EX30_interior
313334_Volvo_EX30_interior
313297_Volvo_EX30

Reviews Volvo EX30

3.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
Maes Ivo
13 May 2026, 21:43:53

Volvo EX30 twin performance is een super handige compacte auto die vast op de weg ligt . Is pijlsnel en je zit iets hoger. Interieur went snel . Ik heb er zelf eentje en ben er verliefd op . Heb BMW G30 gehad . Fantastische auto , maar groot en onhandig . Geef mij maar de Volvo en we zijn maar met 2 .

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michael
10 Feb 2026, 21:18:58

...the best electric car we've driven so far. Trouble-free, safe, tidy and easy to use.

The German predecessors (the Wolfsburg group) can be completely forgotten!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Julien B.
10 Feb 2026, 15:47:03

A car that could have been brilliant, ruined by technological dogmatism. Ninety‑five percent of this car’s problems are between the windshield and the steering wheel. The positives are undone by a botched implantation of technology at all costs. Basic functions are hard to access, buried in menus, and the constant, useless warnings and alerts make the experience frustrating and wreck the overall ergonomics. Add recurring issues with the door‑locking system that the dealer can’t fix after several visits, a range far below what’s promised, and a collision‑avoidance system that randomly takes dangerous initiatives, and I can say this is the worst car I’ve ever bought. After several months, I deeply regret this purchase.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marco
30 Dec 2025, 12:53:45

The onboard tech (tablet) takes too long to learn. It distracts from driving. Not suitable for the nearsighted — the tablet’s distance from your eyes basically forces you to wear trifocals. Letting off the gas slows the car, but it’s overly sensitive and you need time to get used to it. The buzzer for exceeding the speed limit is very annoying, and the system notices changes in road signs late. In short: driving it is stressful.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
NickoNamo
22 Dec 2025, 18:10:11

Compact, attractive and—above all—safe car with a modern interior.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX30
Volvo EC40
VS
The Volvo EX30 and Volvo EC40 pit a compact, city-focused electric with lively handling against a larger, comfort-oriented electric aimed at family use. This comparison highlights key differences in range, interior space, driving feel and tech to help you choose which suits your needs.
Volvo EX30
VW ID.Polo
VS
The Volvo EX30 and Volkswagen ID. Polo show two different philosophies for compact electrics: the EX30 emphasizes sporty performance, advanced safety and premium Scandinavian design, while the ID. Polo focuses on everyday practicality, value and efficient city driving. We'll compare range, …
Ford Explorer EV
Volvo EX30
VS
Deciding between the Ford Explorer EV and the Volvo EX30 is essentially choosing between roomy, family-focused SUV capability and a compact, premium electric that prioritizes agility and efficiency. I’ll compare driving dynamics, range, tech, practicality and value to help you pick the best EV for …
Renault R5
Volvo EX30
VS
The Renault 5 brings playful retro charm and clever city-sized packaging, while the Volvo EX30 feels like a pocket rocket from the future with serious EV range and safety tech. If you want personality and urban thrift go R5, but if you crave rapid electric shove, cutting-edge gadgets and …
Volvo EX30
Kia EV2
VS
Unsure whether the Volvo EX30 or the Kia EV2 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Dacia Spring
Hyundai Inster
VS
The Dacia Spring vs Hyundai Inster pits an ultra‑affordable, no‑frills electric city car against Hyundai’s more fully featured alternative. Choose the Spring for the lowest purchase cost and simple practicality, or the Inster for greater comfort, equipment and perceived refinement.
Volvo EX30
VW ID.3
VS
The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact, sharply tuned EV with Scandinavian flair — sprightly, surprisingly premium and built to put a grin on urban commutes. The VW ID.3, by contrast, plays the sensible family card with more interior space, comfort and range options, so pick the EX30 for driving fun …
Dacia Spring
BYD Dolphin Surf
VS
The Dacia Spring and BYD Dolphin Surf compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Dacia Spring
Volvo EX30

Costs and Consumption
Price
14,500 - 16,900 £
Price
30,000 - 47,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
12.4 - 12.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
221 - 225 km
Electric Range
339 - 475 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,070 kg
Curb weight
1,840 - 1,960 kg
Trunk capacity
308 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,583 mm
Width
1,838 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
274 kg
Payload
370 - 390 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
70 - 100 HP
Power HP
150 - 428 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.6 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
137 Nm
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
52 - 75 kW
Power kW
110 - 315 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Dacia
Brand
Volvo
Is the Dacia Spring offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.