Compare performance (130 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (34,000 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – DS Automobiles DS 4 or Mazda CX-30?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-competitive car market, two models stand out in their respective segments, bringing a blend of stylish design and advanced technology. The DS Automobiles DS 4 and Mazda CX-30 offer unique propositions for potential buyers. Let's delve into their technical aspects and innovations to determine which car edges ahead in this contest.
The DS 4 is a hatchback with distinctive aesthetics, flaunting a length of 4,400 mm, a width of 1,830 mm, and a height of 1,470 mm. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 takes the form of an SUV, measuring slightly shorter in length at 4,395 mm, a tad narrower at 1,795 mm, but taller at 1,540 mm. Both vehicles accommodate five seats across their interiors, offering roomy layouts fit for families and adventurers alike.
The DS 4 provides a versatile range of engine options, including Diesel, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, and a Plugin Hybrid variant. Its power spectrum reaches up to 224 hp with torque peaking at 360 Nm. Drivers opting for the DS 4 Plugin Hybrid can revel in eco-friendly efficiency with a fuel consumption of just 1.4 L/100 km and an electric range of 62 km.
Conversely, the Mazda CX-30 sticks with a petrol MHEV engine lineup, offering power outputs of up to 186 hp with a torque of 240 Nm. The CX-30 boasts a pretty competitive acceleration, with the ability to go from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds.
The DS 4 comes exclusively with an automatic transmission, offering both automatic gearbox and dual-clutch automatic variants. It employs a front-wheel-drive layout, emphasizing stable and refined handling.
On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30 provides more flexibility with both manual and automatic transmission options, and a choice between front-wheel and all-wheel drive systems, catering to different driving preferences and terrain conditions.
In terms of fuel efficiency, the DS 4 Hybrid leads with a commendable 1.4 L/100 km, while its petrol versions range between 5.2 and 6.1 L/100 km. The DS 4 also highlights environmental consciousness with a low CO2 output of 32 g/km in its Plugin Hybrid variant.
The Mazda CX-30's petrol engines consume fuel between 5.7 and 6.6 L/100 km, reflecting its practicality as a day-to-day SUV. Its CO2 emissions start from 129 g/km, positioning the CX-30 in a respectable segment of eco-awareness.
Ultimately, the choice between the DS 4 and Mazda CX-30 comes down to individual preferences. The DS 4 offers a fusion of style and sustainable driving options, particularly appealing for those conscious of their environmental footprint. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 provides versatility, robust performance, and an engaging driving experience, making it suitable for varying driving conditions and preferences.
The decision is yours; both cars showcase distinct strengths within their categories, emphasizing the future of automotive innovation and design.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-30 is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the DS Automobiles DS 4 costs 34,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,743 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the DS Automobiles DS 4 uses 5.2 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers visibly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 56 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the DS Automobiles DS 4 takes 10.9 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the DS Automobiles DS 4 delivers slightly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is very slightly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,558 kg. The difference is around 103 kg.
Boot capacity is identical – both offer 430 L of storage.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries a bit more – 496 kg compared to 442 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.
The Mazda CX-30 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The DS 4 is a striking compact that wears couture-inspired styling like a tailored suit, and its cabin feels more boutique hotel than ordinary hatchback with premium materials and clever detailing. On the road it mixes poise with comfort, rewarding drivers who want a refined, characterful alternative to the usual suspects — and enjoy the odd admiring glance at the lights.
details
The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,000 - 41,700 £
|
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
137 g/km
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
53 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,558 kg
|
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
430 L
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
|
Length
4,400 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,830 mm
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
|
Height
1,470 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,240 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
442 kg
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
203 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
300 Nm
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
96 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
DS Automobiles
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España