VS

DS Automobiles DS 4 vs Mazda CX-30 comparison

Compare performance (130 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (34,000 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – DS Automobiles DS 4 or Mazda CX-30?

DS Automobiles DS 4 vs Mazda CX-30: Key differences

DS Automobiles DS 4

  • very slightly more efficient
details

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

DS 4

Battle of Styles: DS 4 vs. Mazda CX-30

In the ever-competitive car market, two models stand out in their respective segments, bringing a blend of stylish design and advanced technology. The DS Automobiles DS 4 and Mazda CX-30 offer unique propositions for potential buyers. Let's delve into their technical aspects and innovations to determine which car edges ahead in this contest.

CX-30

Design and Dimensions

The DS 4 is a hatchback with distinctive aesthetics, flaunting a length of 4,400 mm, a width of 1,830 mm, and a height of 1,470 mm. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 takes the form of an SUV, measuring slightly shorter in length at 4,395 mm, a tad narrower at 1,795 mm, but taller at 1,540 mm. Both vehicles accommodate five seats across their interiors, offering roomy layouts fit for families and adventurers alike.

DS 4

Engine and Performance

The DS 4 provides a versatile range of engine options, including Diesel, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, and a Plugin Hybrid variant. Its power spectrum reaches up to 224 hp with torque peaking at 360 Nm. Drivers opting for the DS 4 Plugin Hybrid can revel in eco-friendly efficiency with a fuel consumption of just 1.4 L/100 km and an electric range of 62 km.

Conversely, the Mazda CX-30 sticks with a petrol MHEV engine lineup, offering power outputs of up to 186 hp with a torque of 240 Nm. The CX-30 boasts a pretty competitive acceleration, with the ability to go from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds.

CX-30

Transmission and Drive

The DS 4 comes exclusively with an automatic transmission, offering both automatic gearbox and dual-clutch automatic variants. It employs a front-wheel-drive layout, emphasizing stable and refined handling.

On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30 provides more flexibility with both manual and automatic transmission options, and a choice between front-wheel and all-wheel drive systems, catering to different driving preferences and terrain conditions.

DS 4

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

In terms of fuel efficiency, the DS 4 Hybrid leads with a commendable 1.4 L/100 km, while its petrol versions range between 5.2 and 6.1 L/100 km. The DS 4 also highlights environmental consciousness with a low CO2 output of 32 g/km in its Plugin Hybrid variant.

The Mazda CX-30's petrol engines consume fuel between 5.7 and 6.6 L/100 km, reflecting its practicality as a day-to-day SUV. Its CO2 emissions start from 129 g/km, positioning the CX-30 in a respectable segment of eco-awareness.

CX-30

Final Verdict

Ultimately, the choice between the DS 4 and Mazda CX-30 comes down to individual preferences. The DS 4 offers a fusion of style and sustainable driving options, particularly appealing for those conscious of their environmental footprint. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 provides versatility, robust performance, and an engaging driving experience, making it suitable for varying driving conditions and preferences.

The decision is yours; both cars showcase distinct strengths within their categories, emphasizing the future of automotive innovation and design.

Frequently compared as well

Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

DS 4

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-30 is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the DS Automobiles DS 4 costs 34,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,272 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the DS Automobiles DS 4 uses 5.2 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.

CX-30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers visibly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 56 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the DS Automobiles DS 4 takes 10.9 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the DS Automobiles DS 4 delivers slightly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.

DS 4

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is very slightly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,558 kg. The difference is around 103 kg.

Boot capacity is identical – both offer 430 L of storage.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries a bit more – 496 kg compared to 442 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,700
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
details
DS Automobiles DS 4
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

DS Automobiles DS 4

The DS 4 is a striking compact that wears couture-inspired styling like a tailored suit, and its cabin feels more boutique hotel than ordinary hatchback with premium materials and clever detailing. On the road it mixes poise with comfort, rewarding drivers who want a refined, characterful alternative to the usual suspects — and enjoy the odd admiring glance at the lights.

details
2020_DS4_V0058
2020_DS4_V0061
ds4-1
2020_DS4_V0057

Reviews DS Automobiles DS 4

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
Carlos
18 Jul 2026, 09:40:54

The Mazda is a more elegant car, less cumbersome and, even though it’s also an SUV, it feels less like an SUV and more like a regular car. Besides having an interior that feels more "like a real car" and less "smartphone," the finishes are also superior and the dynamic behavior is better. The lower power is made up for by being about 100 kg lighter, a lower vehicle height (more aerodynamic efficiency), and a smoother drive thanks to a high-displacement, non-turbo engine. The equipment is very similar but the Mazda just has more "class." Prices are comparable with equal equipment, and the difference is size: the Tucson being 11 cm longer is noticeable, especially in the boot — the Mazda’s is fine, but the Tucson’s is cavernous. If you don’t actually need something that big, I recommend the Mazda.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossovers that each aim to combine everyday practicality with a touch of style, but they take different routes on ride feel, interior quality and tech. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the CX-30’s near-premium cabin and engaging …
DS Automobiles DS 4
DS Automobiles DS 7
VS
DS Automobiles DS 4 and DS Automobiles DS 7 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the DS …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
DS Automobiles DS 4
Hyundai Tucson
VS
DS Automobiles DS 4 and Hyundai Tucson go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the DS Automobiles …
DS Automobiles DS 4
Peugeot 408
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact executive cars, the DS 4 and Peugeot 408 showcase distinctive styles and advanced technologies that cater to different tastes. While the DS 4 emphasizes luxury and refinement with its upscale materials and design elements, the Peugeot 408 offers a more …
Honda HR-V
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Honda HR-V and Mazda CX-30 stand out for their unique appeal and driving dynamics. While the HR-V offers a spacious interior and versatile cargo options, the CX-30 impresses with its upscale cabin and engaging handling. Ultimately, your choice between …
Kia XCeed
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive compact crossover segment, the Kia XCeed stands out with its sporty design and a rich set of standard features, providing a more youthful and contemporary driving experience. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 delivers a premium feel with its upscale interior, engaging handling, and …
DS Automobiles DS 4
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
34,000 - 41,700 £
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
137 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
53 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,558 kg
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Trunk capacity
430 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
4,400 mm
Length
-
Width
1,830 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
1,470 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,240 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
442 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
203 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
96 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
DS Automobiles
Brand
Mazda
Is the DS Automobiles DS 4 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.