Ford Bronco vs Omoda 5 – Which car suits you better?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Omoda 5 has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £, while the Ford Bronco costs 58200 £. That’s a price difference of around 35100 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Omoda 5 manages with 7.50 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Ford Bronco with 11.30 L. The difference is about 3.80 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance: Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Bronco has a distinct edge – offering 335 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 131 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Bronco is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 6.70 s, while the Omoda 5 takes 7.80 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Omoda 5 performs distinct better – reaching 220 km/h, while the Ford Bronco tops out at 161 km/h. The difference is around 59 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Bronco pulls decisively stronger with 563 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 273 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use: Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Bronco offers convincingly more room – 562 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 562 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Bronco performs significantly better – up to 1804 L, which is about 729 L more than the Omoda 5.

Our conclusion: The Ford Bronco proves to be is largely superior and thus becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Overall, Ford Bronco is the better all-rounder in this comparison.