VS

Omoda 5 vs VW T-Roc – Differences & prices compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Omoda 5 or VW T-Roc fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Omoda 5 has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £, while the VW T-Roc costs 26400 £. That’s a price difference of around 3296 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW T-Roc manages with 5.50 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the Omoda 5 with 7.50 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 5 has a evident edge – offering 204 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 5 is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 7.80 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.90 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Omoda 5 performs barely noticeable better – reaching 220 km/h, while the VW T-Roc tops out at 212 km/h. The difference is around 8 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Omoda 5 pulls to a small extent stronger with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of boot space, the VW T-Roc offers clearly more room – 475 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 475 L.

In maximum load capacity, the VW T-Roc performs noticeable better – up to 1350 L, which is about 275 L more than the Omoda 5.

Who wins the race?

The VW T-Roc proves to be offers a more balanced package and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
VW T-Roc is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £26,400
DB2022AU00087_medium

VW T-Roc

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.5 - 6.3 L
details

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a striking addition to the automotive market, offering a sleek and modern design that is sure to turn heads. Its interior is crafted with high-quality materials, providing both comfort and a sense of luxury. The vehicle delivers an impressive driving experience with its cutting-edge technology and responsive handling, making it a strong contender in its segment.

details

VW T-Roc

5 (2)
rate

The VW T-Roc seamlessly blends stylish design with practical functionality, making it an ideal choice for those who enjoy both urban and countryside driving. Its modern interior features intuitive technology and comfortable seating, enhancing the overall driving experience. With its robust build and dynamic performance, the T-Roc is equipped to handle various road conditions with confidence.

details
DB2022AU00087_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2022AU00088_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2022AU00086_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2022AU00095_medium @ Volkswagen

Similar Comparisons

Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling and sensible practicality combine to make it the smarter pick if you want SUV looks and fun without paying for the badge.
VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the VW Golf continues to impress with its blend of practicality and performance, making it a perennial favorite among hatchback enthusiasts. In contrast, the VW T-Roc offers a more rugged aesthetic and a higher driving position, appealing to those who crave a crossover experience without sacrificing the fun-to-drive nature of a VW. Ultimately, both models cater to different needs, with the Golf focusing on agility and efficiency, while the T-Roc emphasizes style and versatility for a modern lifestyle.
Omoda 5
VW T-Roc
T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price
23100 £
Price
26400 - 38000 £
Consumption L/100km
7.50 L
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
-
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
51 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
2 - 5
Curb weight
-
Curb weight
1465 - 1539 kg
Trunk capacity
0 L
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
Length
4424 mm
Length
4271 - 4373 mm
Width
1830 mm
Width
1811 - 1828 mm
Height
1588 mm
Height
1527 - 1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
1075 L
Max trunk capacity
1350 L
Payload
-
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.80 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
220 km/h
Max Speed
187 - 212 km/h
Torque
290 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
145 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1598 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Omoda
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

Kia Niro
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Kia Niro stands out with its impressive fuel efficiency and eco-friendly hybrid options, making it an attractive choice for environmentally conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers a sportier aesthetic and a more dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. Ultimately, both models cater to different needs, with the Niro emphasizing sustainability and the T-Roc focusing on a fun, engaging ride.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Volvo XC40
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Volvo XC40 stands out with its stylish Scandinavian design and commitment to safety, offering a serene driving experience complemented by a high-quality interior. On the other hand, the VW T-Roc impresses with its sportier dynamics and customizable features, appealing to drivers who prioritize a more engaging ride. Ultimately, the choice between the XC40 and T-Roc boils down to personal preferences in style, comfort, and driving experience.
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive segment of compact SUVs, the Nissan Qashqai and VW T-Roc stand out for their unique styling and diverse feature sets. While the Qashqai is celebrated for its spacious interior and user-friendly technology, the T-Roc appeals to those seeking a sportier performance and premium interior options. Ultimately, choosing between these two best-sellers will depend on whether practicality or a dynamic driving experience takes precedence for the buyer.
Vauxhall Frontera
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of SUVs, the Opel Frontera stands as a solid, robust option with a storied history of off-road capability, making it appealing to adventure seekers. Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers a more modern aesthetic with a focus on stylish urban driving, advanced safety features, and tech-savvy interior appointments. When choosing between the two, potential buyers will weigh the Frontera's rugged legacy against the T-Roc's contemporary flair and agility.
BYD Seal U
Omoda 5
VS
In the rapidly evolving electric vehicle market, the BYD Seal U and Omoda 5 present compelling options for eco-conscious drivers. The BYD Seal U boasts a more spacious interior and advanced battery technology, offering longer range and faster charging times, making it an ideal choice for those seeking efficiency and comfort. On the other hand, the Omoda 5 stands out with its bold design and feature-rich infotainment system, appealing to tech-savvy individuals who prioritize style and connectivity in their driving experience.
Toyota C-HR
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Toyota C-HR stands out with its striking design and hybrid efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers. In contrast, the VW T-Roc offers a more traditional, yet stylish approach with a focus on practicality and customizable features, catering to those who value versatility. Ultimately, both vehicles bring unique strengths to the table, making the choice between them largely dependent on personal preference and lifestyle needs.
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the SEAT Ateca and VW T-Roc present compelling options for buyers seeking style and performance. While the Ateca offers a sportier handling demeanor and a more engaging driving experience, the T-Roc shines with its premium interior and advanced technology features. Both vehicles provide ample space and versatility, making them ideal choices for urban lifestyles, but each has its unique flair to cater to different tastes.
What drive types are available for the Omoda 5?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.