VS

Omoda 5 vs VW T-Roc comparison

Compare performance (224 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Omoda 5 or VW T-Roc?

Omoda 5 vs VW T-Roc: Key differences

Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • noticeably more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
details

VW T-Roc

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

5

Omoda 5 VS VW T‑Roc: quick take

Omoda 5 VS VW T‑Roc pits a value‑heavy newcomer against a more established, refined compact SUV. The Omoda 5 arrives with bold standard kit and a long warranty that aim squarely at price‑sensitive buyers, while the VW T‑Roc leans on improved materials, space and composed manners. That sets up a clear trade‑off: headline equipment and a peppier character versus everyday refinement, rear‑seat practicality and perceived quality. Read on for how those differences actually play out in city driving, long trips and family life.

T-Roc

Character and driving feel

The Omoda 5 feels livelier off the line — it delivers stronger shove and a sense of urgency that rewards straight‑line driving. That energetic engine note and shove, though, sit on a chassis tuned soft, so steering is vague and the body can bobble over rough surfaces which blunts driver confidence on twisty roads. The VW T‑Roc is the more assured companion: precise steering, predictable reactions and a stability that makes brisk driving feel composed rather than theatrical. In short, choose Omoda 5 if you prioritise punch and kit; pick the T‑Roc if you want a more confidence‑inspiring, balanced drive.

Comfort on commutes and long distances

On long runs the VW T‑Roc relaxes occupants more easily, thanks to quieter insulation and a damping character that smooths motorway miles. The Omoda 5 is comfortable up front and the hybrid form brings noticeably lower noise and better economy, but its softer suspension and tendency to resonate over repeated bumps can become wearing on poor secondary roads. T‑Roc's quieter aerodynamic tuning and higher‑grade finishes also make long hours in the car feel less fatiguing. So frequent motorway commuters and those who favour calm interiors will tend to prefer the T‑Roc’s long‑distance manners.

Practicality, rear space and city manners

For family life the VW T‑Roc is the more practical pick: visibly more rear legroom, a larger, more usable boot with a variable floor and a split‑folding rear seat that makes loading and child‑seat fitting simpler. The Omoda 5 fights back with clever front‑seat storage, cameras and parking aids, but its back seat is tighter and the boot shallower and flatter, which shows when you pack for a weekend away. In town both are compact enough to park, but the T‑Roc's forward visibility and intuitive ergonomics feel easier at slow speeds, whereas the Omoda 5 leans on cameras to mask its awkward rear sightlines. If you regularly carry rear passengers or bulky loads, the T‑Roc will feel more accommodating day to day.

Cabin feel and everyday tech

Step into the VW T‑Roc and the quality jump is obvious: softer materials, better panel fit and an interior that reads as more premium immediately. The Omoda 5 trades on a flashier spec sheet — large screens, advanced safety kit and lots of features as standard — but closer inspection reveals fiddly menus, small touch targets and assistants that can be over‑eager. Both move toward digital controls, yet the T‑Roc keeps more tactile shortcuts which cut distraction, while the Omoda makes its strengths felt through equipment and warranty rather than finish. So if tactile quality and a grown‑up feel matter most, the T‑Roc wins on presence; if you care about what you get for the money, the Omoda 5’s spec is persuasive.

Who each car really suits

Choose the Omoda 5 if your priority is low entry price, long warranty, a generous standard equipment list and the quieter, economical benefits of the hybrid option — you accept tighter rear seats and a busier chassis in return for value. Opt for the VW T‑Roc if you want a more refined cabin, more usable rear space and boot, calmer high‑speed behaviour and the tactile ergonomics of a familiar Volkswagen, even if the price climbs with options. Families and buyers who haul kit or passengers regularly will lean T‑Roc; budget‑minded individuals who prize headline tech and warranty will be drawn to the Omoda 5. The technical comparison below will translate these editorial differences into the specific powertrains, cargo numbers and gear choices that determine everyday ownership.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you prioritise everyday practicality and value or a bolder, slightly sportier compact SUV. Both share similar underpinnings, but the Kamiq excels in interior space and efficiency while the T‑Roc offers sharper styling and a …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

5

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Omoda 5 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,667 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Omoda 5 uses 5.3 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

T-Roc

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 5 offers noticeably more power – delivering 224 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 74 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 5 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Omoda 5 delivers markedly more torque with 340 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 90 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Roc is somewhat lighter – 1,465 kg compared to 1,621 kg. The difference is around 156 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW T-Roc offers markedly more boot space – 475 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 125 L.

When it comes to payload, the Omoda 5 carries very slightly more – 536 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 21 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Omoda 5 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,800
5

Omoda 5

  • Engine Type Electric, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 224 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 430 km
details
Omoda 5
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a stylish compact crossover that catches the eye with a bold, contemporary look and a tech-forward cabin. It offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly spacious interior, making it a practical yet distinctive choice for buyers who want modern features and solid value.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pablo
8 May 2026, 07:59:00

Fantastic. It would be great to have a bit more battery capacity and a higher DC charging speed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

VW T-Roc

The Volkswagen T‑Roc is a stylish, well-proportioned crossover that blends hatchback agility with SUV presence. It delivers a comfortable cabin, user-friendly tech and a composed ride, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want practicality with a bit of character.

details
DB2025AU01832_medium
DB2025AU01833_medium
DB2025AU01840_medium
DB2025AU01844_medium
DB2025AU01835_medium
DB2025AU01866_medium
DB2025AU01834_medium
DB2025AU01852_medium

Reviews VW T-Roc

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Krock
17 Jul 2026, 13:11:35

If a designer had suggested such ugly dashboards a few years ago, he would have been fired immediately!
Today everyone thinks it’s great when you place cutting boards vertically on the hard‑plastic dashboards and even pay a lot of money for it. I’m probably already too old to understand this!!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ester
17 Sept 2025, 14:29:41

I've been driving the VW T‑Roc for a few months now and I'm totally satisfied. 🚗 The higher seating position gives me a great feeling of security and the visibility in city traffic is excellent. I especially like the modern infotainment system — everything works intuitively and quickly. On the motorway it feels very calm and stable, even at higher speeds. Overall a great car that's a lot of fun and still economical.

Frequently compared as well

VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
Deciding between the VW Golf and the VW T‑Roc is about choosing whether you prefer a classic, driver-focused hatchback or a compact SUV with higher ride height and added practicality. The Golf delivers sharper handling and refined efficiency, while the T‑Roc brings more interior space and a more …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
Skoda Karoq
VW T-Roc
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible family hero — roomy boot, comfortable seats and clever practicality — while the VW T‑Roc swaps some of that pragmatism for sharper styling and a livelier, more involving drive. Choose the Karoq for space and value, the T‑Roc if you want personality and a bit more fun …
Renault Captur
VW T-Roc
VS
The Renault Captur and the VW T‑Roc are two popular compact crossovers that combine agile urban sizing with SUV styling, yet they differ in driving feel, interior quality and practicality. This quick comparison highlights the key strengths and trade-offs to help you choose the better fit for …
Ford Puma
VW T-Roc
VS
The Ford Puma and the VW T‑Roc are two top choices in the compact crossover segment, but they deliver different strengths — the Puma leans sporty and driver-focused while the T‑Roc prioritises space and refinement. This quick comparison will highlight how their performance, practicality and tech …
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Audi Q3 and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you value Audi’s upmarket feel and refinement or the T‑Roc’s sharper pricing and practical versatility. This comparison focuses on real-world driving, interior quality, technology and running costs to help you decide which compact …
MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Honda HR-V
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Honda HR‑V and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you prioritise practical versatility and fuel economy or sharper styling and a more engaging drive. In this comparison I’ll cut through the specs and show how they stack up on space, comfort, technology and running costs so you …
Omoda 5
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,800 - 31,600 £
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
430 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 120 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,621 - 1,710 kg
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
Trunk capacity
300 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,824 - 1,830 mm
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
431 - 536 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 224 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
295 - 340 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
150 - 165 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Omoda
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the Omoda 5?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.