Compare performance (340 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (36,300 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Capri or Skoda Kodiaq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
As the SUV market heats up, new contenders are emerging to claim a slice of this ever-expanding segment. Among them, the Ford Capri and Skoda Kodiaq stand out, each bringing unique features and innovations to the table. In this article, we delve into both models’ technical specifications and strengths, helping you decide which might be the perfect fit for you.
The Ford Capri opts for an all-electric approach, offering a variety of power outputs ranging from 170 HP to 340 HP. This provides a surprisingly dynamic performance for an SUV, with impressive acceleration times clocking in at 5.3 to 6.4 seconds for 0-100 km/h. With a zero emissions output, the Capri makes a strong case for eco-conscious buyers.
On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq caters to diverse preferences by offering multiple engine types including plugin hybrid, petrol MHEV, diesel, and petrol. The Kodiaq delivers up to 265 HP, with acceleration times ranging between 6.3 to 9.7 seconds for 0-100 km/h, depending on the powertrain. This versatility in engine choice makes it attractive for those looking for flexibility in fuel types and performance.
The Ford Capri’s all-electric powertrains lead to an efficient driving experience with energy consumption between 13.3 to 15.8 kWh/100km. Impressively, it provides an electric range of up to 627 km, thanks to a battery capacity of up to 79 kWh, making it highly capable for long-distance travel.
Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq’s plugin hybrid version boasts a notable electric range of up to 123 km on a 19.7 kWh battery. For those who prefer traditional fuel, the Kodiaq offers consumption ranging from 0.4 to 8.2 L/100km, catering to varying needs and price points.
Both models deliver on interior comfort, featuring 5 seats and ample space. The Ford Capri offers a trunk capacity of up to 572 liters, perfectly adequate for family adventures. Its modern design will certainly appeal to tech-savvy drivers, with a focus on digital interface and user-friendly settings.
The Skoda Kodiaq, however, takes the lead in storage, offering between 745 to 910 liters of trunk capacity, an attractive choice for those needing extra room. The Kodiaq’s cabin is designed with practicality in mind, providing a comfortable ride and advanced infotainment features.
The Ford Capri's design language is futuristic and dynamic, emphasizing its role as an electric SUV. The modern aesthetic is complemented by features aimed at improving efficiency and performance, such as aerodynamic enhancements and a reduction gearbox transmission.
Skoda’s approach with the Kodiaq is rooted in versatility and traditional appeal. It offers a robust build with a focus on safety and convenience, including their latest safety technologies and user-friendly systems.
Choosing between the Ford Capri and Skoda Kodiaq ultimately depends on your priorities. If you’re inclined toward cutting-edge electric performance with zero emissions, the Ford Capri stands out as a pioneering choice. However, if you value versatility in powertrain options and traditional practicality, the Skoda Kodiaq offers a robust and adaptable alternative.
Both models are formidable contenders in the SUV domain, each with its own set of advantages, ensuring that there’s a perfect match for every driver’s needs.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Capri is only slightly cheaper – starting at 36,300 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,535 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Capri offers considerably more range – reaching up to 627 km, about 505 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Capri offers noticeably more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 75 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Capri is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.3 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Capri delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 279 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is somewhat lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 2,001 kg. The difference is around 317 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers visibly more boot space – 910 L compared to 572 L. That’s a difference of about 338 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Capri carries only slightly more – 587 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 24 kg.
The Ford Capri stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Capri turned the family car into something cheekily sporty, with a long, rakish profile that still promises fun at a glance. Today it lives on as a lovable classic — easy to tinker with, enjoyable to drive and guaranteed to raise smiles at any meet.
details
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,300 - 51,800 £
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
439 - 627 km
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,001 - 2,206 kg
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
572 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,872 mm
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
539 - 587 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España