Compare performance (340 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 33,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Explorer EV or KGM Musso?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
KGM Musso is very slightly cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the Ford Explorer EV costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 780 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Explorer EV offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 138 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Explorer EV delivers markedly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 441 Nm. That’s about 238 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Explorer EV is only slightly lighter – 1,996 kg compared to 2,070 kg. The difference is around 74 kg.
When it comes to payload, the KGM Musso carries considerably more – 1,085 kg compared to 585 kg. That’s a difference of about 500 kg.
The Ford Explorer EV is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Explorer EV brings the familiar presence and practicality of an Explorer into the electric age, offering roomy comfort and modern tech for everyday life and family trips. It feels composed on the road and serves as a straightforward, user-friendly alternative to conventional gas-powered SUVs.
detailsThe Musso is a rugged, no-nonsense pickup that balances practical utility with a comfortable cabin, making it equally at home on a jobsite or a weekend drive. It’s a sensible choice for drivers who want straightforward capability, durability and a reassuringly solid feel without unnecessary complexity.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 49,600 £
|
Price
33,400 - 44,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
8.5 - 9.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
223 - 246 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,996 - 2,209 kg
|
Curb weight
2,070 - 2,185 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,872 mm
|
Width
1,950 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
531 - 585 kg
|
Payload
860 - 1,085 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
202 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
400 - 441 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
149 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
KGM
|