Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Explorer EV vs Mercedes GLC EQ comparison
Compare performance (340 HP vs 489 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 61,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Explorer EV or Mercedes GLC EQ?
Ford Explorer EV vs Mercedes GLC EQ: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Explorer EV
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Explorer EV is significantly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Mercedes GLC EQ costs 61,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,898 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Explorer EV is barely more efficient: consuming 14.6 kWh/100km compared to 14.9 kWh/100km for the Mercedes GLC EQ. That’s a difference of about 0.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers moderately more range – reaching up to 714 km, about 112 km more than the Ford Explorer EV.
GLC EQ
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers visibly more power – delivering 489 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 149 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLC EQ is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.3 s, while the Ford Explorer EV takes 5.3 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLC EQ delivers moderately more torque with 800 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 121 Nm more.
Explorer EV
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Explorer EV is markedly lighter – 1,996 kg compared to 2,535 kg. The difference is around 539 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers moderately more boot space – 570 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 98 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Explorer EV carries a bit more – 585 kg compared to 505 kg. That’s a difference of about 80 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes GLC EQ sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £61,100
Mercedes GLC EQ
Ford Explorer EV
Mercedes GLC EQ
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Explorer EV
The Ford Explorer EV translates the familiar big‑American SUV presence into whisper‑quiet electric motoring, offering roomy seating and a tech‑forward cabin that will please families and road‑trippers alike. It drives with more composure than its boxy looks suggest, blending a comfortable ride and eager acceleration while undercutting the guilt of gas stops — a practical, modern alternative for buyers who want Explorer space with electric charm.
details
Mercedes GLC EQ
The Mercedes GLC EQ brings an electrified touch to Mercedes’ compact luxury SUV line, combining a quiet, refined ride with the comfort and polish you expect from the brand. It’s a smart choice for buyers who want premium materials and everyday practicality while reducing fuel use, though it leans more toward comfort than sporty handling.
details
Ford Explorer EV
Mercedes GLC EQ
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 49,600 £
|
Price
61,100 - 70,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
|
Electric Range
645 - 714 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,996 - 2,209 kg
|
Curb weight
2,535 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,872 mm
|
Width
1,913 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
531 - 585 kg
|
Payload
505 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
489 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
360 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.