VS

Ford Explorer EV vs Mitsubishi Colt comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 18,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Explorer EV or Mitsubishi Colt?

Ford Explorer EV vs Mitsubishi Colt: Key differences

Ford Explorer EV

4.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space
details

Mitsubishi Colt

  • substantially cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Explorer EV

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mitsubishi Colt is substantially cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the Ford Explorer EV costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,038 £.

Colt

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Explorer EV offers substantially more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 197 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Explorer EV is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.3 s. That’s about 4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Explorer EV delivers substantially more torque with 679 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 519 Nm more.

Explorer EV

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is substantially lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 1,996 kg. The difference is around 807 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Explorer EV offers a bit more boot space – 472 L compared to 391 L. That’s a difference of about 81 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Explorer EV carries clearly more – 585 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 200 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Explorer EV stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
Explorer EV

Ford Explorer EV

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 417 - 602 km
Ford Explorer EV
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Explorer EV

The Explorer EV brings the familiar presence and practicality of an Explorer into the electric age, offering roomy comfort and modern tech for everyday life and family trips. It feels composed on the road and serves as a straightforward, user-friendly alternative to conventional gas-powered SUVs.

details

Mitsubishi Colt

The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.

details
Ford Explorer EV
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption

Price
34,200 - 49,600 £
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
96 - 119 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,996 - 2,209 kg
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
Trunk capacity
472 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Length
-
Length
4,053 mm
Width
1,872 mm
Width
1,798 mm
Height
-
Height
1,439 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
Payload
531 - 585 kg
Payload
381 - 385 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
174 km/h
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mitsubishi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.