Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Explorer EV vs Toyota Proace Transporter comparison
Compare performance (340 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 31,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Explorer EV or Toyota Proace Transporter?
Ford Explorer EV vs Toyota Proace Transporter: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Explorer EV
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Toyota Proace Transporter is barely cheaper – starting at 31,600 £ , while the Ford Explorer EV costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,565 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Explorer EV is significantly more efficient: consuming 14.6 kWh/100km compared to 23.8 kWh/100km for the Toyota Proace Transporter. That’s a difference of about 9.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Explorer EV offers significantly more range – reaching up to 602 km, about 253 km more than the Toyota Proace Transporter.
Proace Transporter
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Explorer EV offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 190 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Explorer EV is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the Toyota Proace Transporter takes 12.1 s. That’s about 6.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Explorer EV delivers substantially more torque with 679 Nm compared to 370 Nm. That’s about 309 Nm more.
Explorer EV
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Toyota Proace Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota Proace Transporter is clearly lighter – 1,656 kg compared to 1,996 kg. The difference is around 340 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota Proace Transporter carries substantially more – 1,323 kg compared to 585 kg. That’s a difference of about 738 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Explorer EV holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £34,200
Ford Explorer EV
Ford Explorer EV
Toyota Proace Transporter
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Explorer EV
The Ford Explorer EV translates the familiar big‑American SUV presence into whisper‑quiet electric motoring, offering roomy seating and a tech‑forward cabin that will please families and road‑trippers alike. It drives with more composure than its boxy looks suggest, blending a comfortable ride and eager acceleration while undercutting the guilt of gas stops — a practical, modern alternative for buyers who want Explorer space with electric charm.
details
Toyota Proace Transporter
The Toyota Proace Transporter is a no-nonsense work van that pairs Toyota’s dependable reputation with smart practicality, so you can load, drive and finish the job without unnecessary drama. It won’t win design awards, but with a comfortable cab, sensible feature set and a focus on getting things done, it quietly keeps fleets and small businesses smiling.
details
Ford Explorer EV
Toyota Proace Transporter
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 49,600 £
|
Price
31,600 - 51,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
6.4 - 6.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23.8 - 23.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
|
Electric Range
349 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,996 - 2,209 kg
|
Curb weight
1,656 - 2,100 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,872 mm
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
531 - 585 kg
|
Payload
955 - 1,323 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
120 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 370 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
88 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, A, G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Toyota
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.