VS

Ford Explorer EV vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (34200 £ vs 49200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Explorer EV or Volvo XC60?

Ford Explorer EV vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

Ford Explorer EV

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly more electric range

Volvo XC60

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeable more power
  • barely noticeable quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • barely noticeable lighter
  • minimal more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Explorer EV

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Explorer EV has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14991 £.

As for electric range, the Ford Explorer EV performs clearly better – achieving up to 602 km, about 520 km more than the Volvo XC60.

XC60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a noticeable edge – offering 455 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Ford Explorer EV takes 5.30 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 709 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.

Explorer EV

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC60 is barely noticeable lighter – 1900 kg compared to 1996 kg. The difference is around 96 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers minimal more room – 483 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 11 L.

When it comes to payload, Ford Explorer EV minimal takes the win – 585 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Explorer EV holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 is the no-nonsense, go-anywhere compact SUV that scores on reliability, fuel economy and roomy practicality — ideal if you want low fuss, sensible running costs and maximum value. The Volvo XC60 swaps thrift for Scandinavian refinement, with a classier cabin, advanced safety tech …
Ford Explorer EV
Kia EV5
VS
The Ford Explorer EV arrives like a burly, tech-laden American SUV — roomy, confident on the road and aimed at buyers who want presence and practicality in electric form. The Kia EV5 counters with sharper styling, clever packaging and a value-packed tech suite, making it the smarter, more …
Ford Explorer EV
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £34,200
Explorer EV

Ford Explorer EV

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 17.3 kWh
  • Electric Range : 417 - 602 km
details

Ford Explorer EV

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate

The Ford Explorer EV translates the familiar big‑American SUV presence into whisper‑quiet electric motoring, offering roomy seating and a tech‑forward cabin that will please families and road‑trippers alike. It drives with more composure than its boxy looks suggest, blending a comfortable ride and eager acceleration while undercutting the guilt of gas stops — a practical, modern alternative for buyers who want Explorer space with electric charm.

details
339B09E4-87F0-4F47-8A68-7DA1B14BD783
46E73473-7BD4-4D0A-B7B7-433A0148B614
09A01900-4D34-480B-A9A5-1A89755E12FF

Volvo XC60

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Ford Explorer EV

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
Olle Westberg
22 Feb 2026, 20:59:34

600 km real-world range in summer; handles me — I'm just over 190 cm and 100 kg.

Better looking than the ID.4 and often available at a really good price.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
D.W.
29 Oct 2025, 18:09:06

I have owned and worked on Ford products for years and I am now driving an 07 Explorer 4.0 liter. 1 transmission and multiple soft parts and switches >300.000.
Klm. and still looks and runs great.
I am a Ford fan and will continue to be one, however the Rxplorer is looking dated. Come on you guys time for a Ford Home run. How about a totally resigned Ford Explorer. Hey how bout a diesel or a hybrid

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
Ford Explorer EV
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
Price
34200 - 48800 £
Price
49200 - 75100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1996 - 2209 kg
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
Trunk capacity
472 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
-
Length
4708 mm
Width
1872 mm
Width
1902 mm
Height
-
Height
1655 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1543 L
Payload
531 - 585 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Ford Capri
Ford Explorer EV
VS
The Ford Capri is a cheeky, analogue icon that rewards you with pure-driver thrills, whereas the Ford Explorer EV is a spacious, gadget-rich electric SUV built for practicality and long-distance calm. Choose the Capri if you crave character and a cornering grin; choose the Explorer EV if you need …
Ford Explorer EV
Kia EV3
VS
Ford Explorer EV plays the roomy family hero with grown‑up comfort and long‑legged cruising, while the Kia EV3 counters with city‑smart size, clever storage, and value that squeezes your budget less than your parking space. If you haul kids, dogs, and flat‑packs, go Explorer; if you want a …
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Ford Explorer EV
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Explorer EV swaps the Mustang Mach‑E’s athletic poise for SUV practicality, three-row space and a taller stance — ideal if you need family duties, towing and sensible range without sacrificing slick tech. But if you crave sharper handling, a sportier silhouette and a more emotional drive, …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Ford Explorer EV arrives with true American muscle—room for the whole crew, solid range and tow-ready guts—perfect if you want a family hauler that eats motorways for breakfast. The Skoda Elroq, by contrast, is a nimble, value-packed city specialist with clever storage and low running costs, …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of the crossovers, the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 stand out with distinct personalities. The CR-V, known for its reliability and value, excels in practicality with a spacious interior and impressive fuel efficiency. On the other hand, the XC60's luxurious design and advanced safety …
What drive types are available for the Ford Explorer EV?

The Ford Explorer EV is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.