VS

Ford Mustang Convertible vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (446 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (56,900 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Convertible or Renault Clio?

Ford Mustang Convertible vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Ford Mustang Convertible

  • considerably more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Convertible

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Clio is substantially cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Ford Mustang Convertible costs 56,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 39,857 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Ford Mustang Convertible with 12.3 L/100km. The difference is about 8.2 L/100km.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Convertible offers considerably more power – delivering 446 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 288 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Convertible is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Convertible delivers considerably more torque with 540 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 350 Nm more.

Mustang Convertible

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Renault Clio offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is considerably lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,876 kg. The difference is around 674 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries noticeably more – 463 kg compared to 324 kg. That’s a difference of about 139 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Clio is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Clio

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia Picanto
Renault Clio
VS
The Kia Picanto and Renault Clio are popular choices in the small-car market, but they suit different needs: the Picanto excels as an ultra-compact, easy-to-park city car with strong value, while the Clio offers more space, refinement and equipment for everyday family use. If you prioritise low …
MG MG3
Renault Clio
VS
The MG3 and Clio are both small hatchbacks aimed at buyers wanting an affordable, city-friendly car, but they take different approaches to style, equipment and driving character. This comparison looks at where the MG3’s value-focused simplicity stacks up against the Clio’s sharper handling, nicer …
Ford Mustang Convertible
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Convertible

The Ford Mustang Convertible makes every drive feel like a small celebration, its exhaust note and open-air drama turning mundane routes into showstoppers. It’s a car that doubles as a weekend mood lifter and a credible everyday companion, blending swagger with surprising practicality.

details
NEW_FORD_MUSTANG_11-LOW
NEW_FORD_MUSTANG_28-LOW
NEW_FORD_MUSTANG_12-LOW
NEW_FORD_MUSTANG_25-LOW

Reviews Ford Mustang Convertible

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Renault Clio
VW Polo
VS
The Renault Clio and VW Polo are two of Europe's best-selling superminis, each offering smart styling, efficient engines and practical interiors. This comparison focuses on real-world driving, interior space, running costs and tech to help you pick which small car suits you best.
Ford Puma
Renault Clio
VS
The Ford Puma and Renault Clio are two popular compact choices that blend city-friendly dimensions with striking style, yet they adopt different priorities in driving character and practicality. The Puma leans toward a higher-riding, crossover feel with clever boot and storage solutions, while the …
Nissan Juke
Renault Clio
VS
Choosing between the Juke and the Clio comes down to whether you want a compact crossover with bold styling and a higher driving position or a polished, practical hatchback focused on everyday usability. If you prioritise standout looks and a more commanding ride go for the Juke; if you want …
Opel Corsa
Renault Clio
VS
The Vauxhall Corsa and the Renault Clio are two of the UK’s most popular superminis, each offering a different blend of driving feel, practicality and everyday refinement. This comparison will focus on their driving dynamics, interior quality, running costs and practicality to help you decide which …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
City supermini buyers face a tasty dilemma: the Citroën C3 charms with cosy ride comfort, playful looks and practical flair, while the Renault Clio answers with sharper handling, a more premium cabin and smarter tech. Choose the C3 if you prioritise comfort and personality; pick the Clio if you …
Renault Clio
Toyota Corolla
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Renault Clio impresses with its agile urban performance, chic design, and advanced infotainment features, making it a favorite among city dwellers. On the other hand, the Toyota Corolla stands out with its unmatched reliability, spacious interior, and superior …
Ford Mustang Convertible
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
Price
56,900 - 59,900 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
12.3 - 12.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
280 - 282 g/km
co2
92 - 118 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Convertible
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,876 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,916 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
319 - 324 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
446 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 - 5.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
540 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
8
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
328 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
5,038 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault
Is the Ford Mustang Convertible offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Mustang Convertible is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.