Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Aston Martin DBX - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 707 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 204400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Aston Martin DBX?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Aston Martin DBX costs 204400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 179657 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Aston Martin DBX with 14.20 L. The difference is about 8.80 L per 100 km.
DBX
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Aston Martin DBX has a decisively edge – offering 707 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 539 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Aston Martin DBX is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.30 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 4.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Aston Martin DBX performs noticeable better – reaching 310 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 100 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Aston Martin DBX pulls clearly stronger with 900 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 610 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is significantly lighter – 1316 kg compared to 2320 kg. The difference is around 1004 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers hardly perceptible more room – 523 L compared to 491 L. That’s a difference of about 32 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Aston Martin DBX performs somewhat better – up to 1530 L, which is about 247 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Aston Martin DBX distinct takes the win – 710 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 241 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Aston Martin DBX
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Aston Martin DBX
With the DBX, Aston Martin has wrapped its trademark sports-car drama into a high-riding package that looks like it could sprint off the driveway and into a gala, while the cabin pampers occupants with handcrafted leather and theatrical attention to detail. Behind the wheel it feels like a grand tourer that learned how to tackle country roads, serving up surprising agility for such a stately presence and keeping rivals honest with its rarefied blend of performance and luxury.
details
Ford Puma
Aston Martin DBX
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
204400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
14.20 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
323 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
87 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
2320 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
491 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
5039 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1998 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1680 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1530 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
710 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
707 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.30 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
310 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
900 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
8
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
520 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
3982 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2022
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Aston Martin
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.