VS

Ford Puma vs Kia PV5 comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 163 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 32,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Kia PV5?

Ford Puma vs Kia PV5: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • barely more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • barely more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially lighter
details

Kia PV5

  • considerably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Puma is noticeably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Kia PV5 costs 32,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,906 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 19 kWh/100km for the Kia PV5. That’s a difference of about 6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers barely more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 1 km more than the Kia PV5.

PV5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers barely more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 163 HP. That’s roughly 5 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Kia PV5 takes 10.6 s. That’s about 3.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers a bit more torque with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is substantially lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,860 kg. The difference is around 544 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Kia PV5 offers considerably more boot space – 1,330 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 807 L.

When it comes to payload, the Kia PV5 carries substantially more – 790 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 321 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
Ford Puma
Kia PV5

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details

Kia PV5

The Kia EV5 is an exciting new entrant in the landscape of electric SUVs, promising a blend of style and innovation that captures attention. It boasts a sleek and modern design that aligns with Kia's evolving aesthetic identity, blending practicality with eye-catching details. With its foray into the electric vehicle segment, the EV5 is set to offer a highly competitive option for those looking to embrace sustainable mobility without compromising on comfort or tech features.

details
Ford Puma
Kia PV5

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
32,800 - 38,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
19 - 19.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
295 - 416 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van, Bus
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,860 - 2,145 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
1,330 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,895 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
455 - 790 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
121 - 163 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 - 16.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
89 - 120 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Kia
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.