VS

Ford Puma vs Land Rover Defender – Which one offers the better deal?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Ford Puma or Land Rover Defender?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Puma has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Land Rover Defender costs 57900 £. That’s a price difference of around 33086 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Land Rover Defender with 6 L. The difference is about 0.60 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Ford Puma performs clearly better – achieving up to 376 km, about 328 km more than the Land Rover Defender.

Defender @ media.landrover.com

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Defender has a decisively edge – offering 635 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 467 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Defender is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 3.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Defender performs slightly better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Defender pulls decisively stronger with 750 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 460 Nm difference.

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Land Rover Defender offers distinct more seating capacity – 8 vs 5.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is convincingly lighter – 1316 kg compared to 2300 kg. The difference is around 984 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Defender offers noticeable more room – 786 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 263 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Land Rover Defender performs distinct better – up to 2078 L, which is about 795 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, Land Rover Defender decisively takes the win – 819 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 350 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Land Rover Defender shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £57,900
DEF_110_V8_22MY_ONROAD_210721_14

Land Rover Defender

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 635 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 6 - 14.4 L
  • Electric Range : 48 km
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Land Rover Defender

The Land Rover Defender boasts a rugged design that seamlessly blends traditional aesthetics with modern innovation, making it a true icon in the world of off-road vehicles. Its performance capabilities are matched by a luxurious interior, offering comfort and cutting-edge technology for drivers and passengers alike. Whether tackling rough terrains or cruising through city streets, the Defender exudes versatility and reliability, maintaining its reputation as a robust yet refined companion for any adventure.

details
DEF_110_V8_22MY_ONROAD_210721_14 @ media.landrover.com
DEF_110_V8_22MY_ONROAD_210721_15 @ media.landrover.com
DEF_110_V8_22MY_ONROAD_210721_17 @ media.landrover.com
DEF_110_PHEV_22MY_INTERIOR_140721_02 @ media.landrover.com
DEF_110_PHEV_22MY_INTERIOR_140721_21 @ media.landrover.com
LR_DEF_130_23-5MY_07_114_GLHD_ALT_310522_72dpi @ media.landrover.com

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday practicality, the ID.3 for smooth, emissions-free cruising and lower running costs — your wallet and the planet will thank you differently.
Ford Puma
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising range, a spacious interior and brilliant value, making it the smarter, cleaner pick for everyday running.
Ford Puma
Land Rover Defender
Puma
Defender

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
57900 - 172000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
6 - 14.4 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
48 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
15.40 kWh
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
135 - 324 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
89 - 91 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 8
Doors
5
Doors
3 - 5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
2300 - 2745 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
293 - 786 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4323 - 5358 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
2008 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1967 - 1995 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1263 - 2078 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
494 - 819 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
200 - 635 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 10.2 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
175 - 250 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
500 - 750 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
147 - 467 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1997 - 5000 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, D
Brand
Ford
Brand
Land Rover

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma and the Renault 5 both offer unique appeals in the compact car segment. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a blend of style and performance. In contrast, the Renault 5 charms with its iconic retro design and efficient urban mobility, making it a beloved choice for city drivers who appreciate a touch of nostalgia with modern functionality.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Corsa
VS
In the highly competitive compact car segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its robust styling and dynamic driving performance, offering a sporty edge perfect for city and country roads alike. In contrast, the Vauxhall Corsa impresses with its practical design and tech-forward interior, appealing to those who prioritize efficiency and comfort in a more streamlined package. Ultimately, the choice between the Puma and Corsa hinges on whether your preference leans towards spirited driving or urban practicality.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Frontera
VS
In the latest showdown between the Ford Puma and Opel Frontera, performance enthusiasts will find the Puma's sleek design and nimble handling a stark contrast to the Frontera's rugged off-road capabilities. While the Puma excels in urban agility and fuel efficiency, the Frontera stands out for its durability and versatility in challenging terrains. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on personal lifestyle needs, with the Puma appealing more to city drivers and the Frontera capturing the spirit of adventure seekers.
Ford Focus
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma stands out with its stylish design and versatility, offering a sportier feel while maintaining practicality for everyday use.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both vehicles offer impressive tech features, but their differing approaches to style and functionality make this comparison a compelling one for potential buyers.
Ford Puma
VW Golf
VS
In the competitive arena of compact cars, the Ford Puma and VW Golf stand out for their exceptional blend of style and performance. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and agile handling, while the Golf continues to be a benchmark for interior quality and tech features. Ultimately, choosing between these two vehicles may come down to personal preference, as both offer unique strengths tailored to different driving tastes.
Ford Puma
Hyundai Bayon
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover market, the Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon both offer compelling choices for urban drivers. The Ford Puma is praised for its sporty handling and stylish design, making it a favorite for those who enjoy a dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the Hyundai Bayon excels in practicality with its efficient fuel consumption and spacious interior, catering to families and city dwellers alike.
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.