Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Land Rover Defender - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 635 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 57900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Land Rover Defender?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Land Rover Defender costs 57900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 33086 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Land Rover Defender with 6 L. The difference is about 0.60 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma performs clearly better – achieving up to 376 km, about 328 km more than the Land Rover Defender.
Defender
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Defender has a decisively edge – offering 635 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 467 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Defender is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 3.40 s faster.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 210 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Defender pulls decisively stronger with 750 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 460 Nm difference.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Land Rover Defender offers distinct more seating capacity – 8 vs 5.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is convincingly lighter – 1316 kg compared to 2300 kg. The difference is around 984 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Defender offers noticeable more room – 786 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 263 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Land Rover Defender performs distinct better – up to 1875 L, which is about 592 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Defender decisively takes the win – 819 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 350 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Land Rover Defender sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Land Rover Defender
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £57,900
Land Rover Defender
Ford Puma
2.4 (8 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Land Rover Defender
4 (1 Reviews)
The Land Rover Defender looks like it could shrug off a weekend of serious off-road abuse while still turning heads on the high street. Inside it balances practical, no-nonsense utility with enough creature comforts to make daily driving feel less like an expedition and more like a stylish commute—rugged charm with civilized manners.
details
Ford Puma
Land Rover Defender
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
57900 - 172000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
6 - 14.4 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
48 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
135 - 324 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
90 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 8
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
2300 - 2745 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
293 - 786 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
5003 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
2008 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1995 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1875 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
494 - 819 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 635 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 750 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 467 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1997 - 5000 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.