Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Mitsubishi Space Star comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 71 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 11,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mitsubishi Space Star?
Ford Puma vs Mitsubishi Space Star: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mitsubishi Space Star is significantly cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,266 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Space Star uses 4.9 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.
Space Star
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers clearly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 97 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 6.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers substantially more torque with 290 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 188 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is markedly lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 376 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers clearly more boot space – 523 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 288 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries somewhat more – 469 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Mitsubishi Space Star
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Mitsubishi Space Star
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.
details
Ford Puma
Mitsubishi Space Star
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
112 - 125 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
3,845 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,665 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,505 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
359 - 400 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
71 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
102 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
52 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.